지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The study about household register, especially the structure of social stratification by Shikata Hiroshi affected many researchers. The method of classifying social stratification from register record and the general understanding about historical developing process which both based on modernism are not so much different with each other. We want to point out that in Shikata’s analysis about class, he neither regarded the ‘legal’ aspect of national need in household register’s recording process, nor realized the investigation of households was basically based on local total amount system.
Shikata more focused on population and family in his household register study. He analyzed the composition of population and marital relationship from register when the people’s interest at population rose at that time. Although the family study was also influenced by the colonial household register regulation, he suggested the measuring should be observed from perspective of family’s diversity and the separation of small-family and extended?family. Further he developed extend-ed family system into cognate village or kinship group.
The population texts including household register should be recognized as historical demographic resource. Shikata Hiroshi’s study about household register already provided the clue. The colonial period population study should be reconsidered while raise the modernism banner as well as apply the traditional method into east asia society modernization. The feature of east asian demographic resource can use the traditional methodology to show population phenomenon and transition which is different from western modernism.
Shikata more focused on population and family in his household register study. He analyzed the composition of population and marital relationship from register when the people’s interest at population rose at that time. Although the family study was also influenced by the colonial household register regulation, he suggested the measuring should be observed from perspective of family’s diversity and the separation of small-family and extended?family. Further he developed extend-ed family system into cognate village or kinship group.
The population texts including household register should be recognized as historical demographic resource. Shikata Hiroshi’s study about household register already provided the clue. The colonial period population study should be reconsidered while raise the modernism banner as well as apply the traditional method into east asia society modernization. The feature of east asian demographic resource can use the traditional methodology to show population phenomenon and transition which is different from western modernism.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조선후기 사회계층구조와 변동에 대한 이해
3. 조선시대 호적 분석을 통한 ‘인구’ 연구
4. 조선시대 ‘가족’에 대한 인식
5. ‘역사인구학’의 관점에서
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002406328