지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.8
- 수록면
- 215 - 232 (18page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study generally analyses the pronunciation of Korean stops for Chinese speakers, comparing with Korean native speakers，in terms of acoustic and phonetic characteristics. Aiming at the reasons why Chinese speakers mispronounced Korean stops, this research creates an experimental comparison of stops located at two different positions in Korean words, word-initial and word-medial positions, produced by Chinese speakers and Korean native speakers respectively. The parameters used in this experiment, including the voice onset time for frication at both the word-initial and word-medial positions, starting pitch value of stops-following vowels, and closure duration in the word-medial position, are measured and computed by PRAAT. Statistically speaking, as the experiment is running between 66 Chinese speakers and 18 Korean native speakers, we can draw a relatively accurate conclusion: with all the stops that Chinese speakers produced, in terms of acoustic and phonetic features, the fortis /ㄲ, ㅃ, ㄸ/ are similar with those which phonated by Korean native speakers, however lax consonants /ㄱ, ㅂ, ㄷ/ and aspiration /ㅋ, ㅍ, ㅌ/ are not. To illustrate this observation, we figured that, in order to distinguish the difference between lax consonants and aspiration, Chinese speakers deliberately pronounce the lax consonants /ㄱ, ㅂ, ㄷ/ in a higher pitch value (even as high as the pitch value of aspiration pronounced by Korean native speakers). In addition, the starting pitch value of the vowel after /ㅂ, ㅃ, ㅍ/ is lower the rather that after /ㄱ, ㄲ, ㅋ/, /ㄷ, ㄸ, ㅌ/, thus we assume that Chinese speakers would mispronounce /ㅂ, ㅃ, ㅍ/ more. Based on the fact being discovered in the experiment, we figured that the mispronouncing phenomenon that we mentioned earlier accounts for the difference between Chinese and Korean phonological system. Generally speaking, there are two distinctive consonants instead of three in Mandarin stops system, therefore, most Chinese speakers tend to be more sensitive to the existence of aspirations, which leads to the mispronouncing.
목차
1. 서론
2. 선행 연구
3. 음성 실험
4. 결과 및 논의
5. 결론
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 배재연 / 1999 / 음성 환경에 따른 한국어 폐쇄음의음향적 특징: 시간적 특성을 중심으로 / 음성과학 5 (2) : 139 ~ 159
4. [단행본] - 이현복 / 2009 / 중국어 음성학 / 교육과학사 : 53 ~ 55
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 장우혁 / 2009 / 중국어 화자가 발음한 한국어 파열음의 음향적 특성 / 언어연구 26 (3) : 91 ~ 109
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 정명숙 / 2008 / 한국어 학습자를 위한 전략적 발음 교육 －중국인 학습자를 중심으로－ / 한국어학 38 : 345 ~ 369
10. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 高美淑 / 2001 / 漢韓塞音塞擦音的對比實驗研究 / 漢語學習 4 : 51 ~ 54
4. [단행본] - 이현복 / 2009 / 중국어 음성학 / 교육과학사 : 53 ~ 55
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 장우혁 / 2009 / 중국어 화자가 발음한 한국어 파열음의 음향적 특성 / 언어연구 26 (3) : 91 ~ 109
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 정명숙 / 2008 / 한국어 학습자를 위한 전략적 발음 교육 －중국인 학습자를 중심으로－ / 한국어학 38 : 345 ~ 369
10. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 高美淑 / 2001 / 漢韓塞音塞擦音的對比實驗研究 / 漢語學習 4 : 51 ~ 54
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-710-002845176