메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
문무기 (경북대)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제43집
발행연도
2013.8
수록면
159 - 181 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Before the amendment of Act, when an employer sets a retirement age, he/she just shall ‘endeavor’ to set it at 60 years of age or above. But the amended Act on Age Discrimination Prohibition in Employment and Aged Employment Promotion(AADPEAEP) in 2013. 5. 22. ‘compel’ employer to set retirement age at 60 years of age or above(Article 19). The amended Act ‘force’ the employer and trade union formed by the majority of workers into the reorganization of wage system in workplace too. And the Minister of Employment and Labor shall provide counseling, advice and other necessary cooperation and support in regard of the personnel affairs, wages, etc., of the enterprise following the extension of the retirement age (Article 19-2).
Mandatory retirement system is legal on the assumption that it secure workers’ social rights and fundamental labor rights guaranteed by the Constitution and does not discriminate against employees based on age for effective management of the company, without a just reason. For extending the retirement age and promoting the employment of the ages, the current Paid as Service Period System needs to be changed more reasonably, for example a Neutral Pay System against Age and Service Period or the Wage Peak System, with improving the retirement system. And the Claim for Working Hour Reduction or the Phased Retirement System, the endeavor for looking to many ways of aged employment promotion could be investigated in the sense of labor flexibility.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 정년제의 합법성·타당성 검토
Ⅲ. 법정 60세 정년제의 실효성 확보방안
Ⅳ. 고령자 고용촉진을위한 종합적 검토사항
Ⅴ. 맺으며
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (3)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-002796209