지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Is it time now for the Unification of the Korean Peninsula? With the assumption, ‘Unification is the national aim that should be achieved regardless of time’, we can say that time schedules and strategies for the Unification are urgently needed and indispensable. Various discourses have been suggested, but they have certain limits as they have been focused on responses to the possible crises that can be caused by North Korea. Rather, discourse should focus on the Unification itself and the active role that can be taken by South Korea.
This article aims to explore two things. One is the actor problem. Who should be the main actor of Korean Unification? The Unification of the Korean Peninsula can be achieved through various methods and actors. We can say that, it can be achieved through bilateral or multilateral cooperation. Then, what are the possible various combinations of actors regarding the Unification of the Korean Peninsula?
The second aim of this paper is to review the conflicts among domestic actors in South Korea, a country, which should be one of the main actors and initiators of the Unification of the Korean Peninsula. The South Korean sentiments on Unification vary widely from, ‘Unification should be achieved’ to ‘we don"t have to stick to Unification itself.’ Even the argument that ‘Unification should not be pursued’ exists. The negative sentiments are fueled by worries over the problems of expenses and the possible chaotic situation right after Unification.
This article reviews these two problems mentioned above, and, as a result, it suggests that we should focus both on realistic rationality and on practical reality.
This article aims to explore two things. One is the actor problem. Who should be the main actor of Korean Unification? The Unification of the Korean Peninsula can be achieved through various methods and actors. We can say that, it can be achieved through bilateral or multilateral cooperation. Then, what are the possible various combinations of actors regarding the Unification of the Korean Peninsula?
The second aim of this paper is to review the conflicts among domestic actors in South Korea, a country, which should be one of the main actors and initiators of the Unification of the Korean Peninsula. The South Korean sentiments on Unification vary widely from, ‘Unification should be achieved’ to ‘we don"t have to stick to Unification itself.’ Even the argument that ‘Unification should not be pursued’ exists. The negative sentiments are fueled by worries over the problems of expenses and the possible chaotic situation right after Unification.
This article reviews these two problems mentioned above, and, as a result, it suggests that we should focus both on realistic rationality and on practical reality.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 한반도 통일의 전략적 선택 구조
Ⅲ. 통일 과정에서의 행위자 선택과 투-페이스 게임
Ⅳ. 통일과정에서의 사회적 갈등과 통일비용
Ⅴ. 결론 및 문제점의 제시
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-050-002669157