지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Focusing on the dominant actors moving the process to the next phase and on the dominant mode of interaction assumed by the Five-Phase “Spiral” Model, this research illuminates changes in the human rights policies of China and Vietnam before and after their reform policies. Based on these illuminations, the current study examines common and specific features in North Korean human rights policy, and searches for an alternative idea to induce policy change.
According to the “Spiral” Model, sustained bilateral and multilateral network pressure is a major element to induce policy change in a repressive state, especially to move from the second phase to the next three phases. Just as the human dimension of the Helsinki Process offered dissidents and human rights NGOs room for survival and movement in East and Central Europe, a multilateral approach to human rights issues is also needed to induce policy change in China, Vietnam, and North Korea.
In ‘mono-organizational’ socialist states, the birth of new domestic actors needs to be encouraged, along with sustainable links to transnational networks and normative appeals based on the expansion of a new political space and human rights-centered societal discourse. In the case of North Korean human rights issues, this means a two-level approach: vitalizing and organizing an actual “social residual”, based on the assumption that this will be transformed into a “civil society”, and inducing the North Korean government to participate in regional or sub-regional human rights talks that refer to the human dimension of the Helsinki Process.
According to the “Spiral” Model, sustained bilateral and multilateral network pressure is a major element to induce policy change in a repressive state, especially to move from the second phase to the next three phases. Just as the human dimension of the Helsinki Process offered dissidents and human rights NGOs room for survival and movement in East and Central Europe, a multilateral approach to human rights issues is also needed to induce policy change in China, Vietnam, and North Korea.
In ‘mono-organizational’ socialist states, the birth of new domestic actors needs to be encouraged, along with sustainable links to transnational networks and normative appeals based on the expansion of a new political space and human rights-centered societal discourse. In the case of North Korean human rights issues, this means a two-level approach: vitalizing and organizing an actual “social residual”, based on the assumption that this will be transformed into a “civil society”, and inducing the North Korean government to participate in regional or sub-regional human rights talks that refer to the human dimension of the Helsinki Process.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중국?베트남 대비 북한 인권정책 상의 특성: “나선형 5단계론”의 이론적 적실성
Ⅲ. 시민사회와 논쟁적 합리성
Ⅳ. 대안적 모색: 헬싱키 프로세스 인권부문
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-340-001258504