지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.7
- 수록면
- 327 - 356 (30page)
- DOI
- 10.18284/jss.2013.07.32.1.327
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Although East Asia is known as a dynamic region that drives wold economic growth, there have been long lasting conflicts and disputes among regional states. The United States and China compete each other for hegemonic status and China and Japan have disputed over territories in East China islands. Further more, the North Korean nuclear weapon issue has lasted over 20 year and has heightened tension among regional states.
Why East Asian states relations have been conflictual unlike European states despite high level of economic interdependence among the states? In that sense, the purpose of this paper is identify major factors that have determined such conflicts and disputes among East Asian countries. For the purpose, it examines some case studies as the competitive relationship between the United States and China, the China-Japan territorial dispute, and the North Korean nuclear weapon dispute.
The results of the case studies show that change of distribution of power between the United States and China due to the rapid growth of Chinese national power induced the United States that had preferred to maintain hegemonic power status to restrain and contain China. In contrast, China also began to adopt internal and external measures to make balance with the U.S. power by building strong military capabilities and creating alliance with other states like Russia. Second, the case of China-Japan territorial dispute also confirms that stiff national power growth of China played significant role in intensifying China-Japan dispute. However, the issue of Japanese "past affairs" also provided amplification impact on the bilateral dispute. The North Korea nuclear weapon case indicated that such domestic political and economic factors as maintenance of political power and economic crisis played important role in leading international conflicts among East Asian states. Thus, it is confirmed that not only change of power distribution but also some cognitive and domestic factors like "past affairs" and "economic crisis" have determined conflicts or disputes among East Asian States.
Why East Asian states relations have been conflictual unlike European states despite high level of economic interdependence among the states? In that sense, the purpose of this paper is identify major factors that have determined such conflicts and disputes among East Asian countries. For the purpose, it examines some case studies as the competitive relationship between the United States and China, the China-Japan territorial dispute, and the North Korean nuclear weapon dispute.
The results of the case studies show that change of distribution of power between the United States and China due to the rapid growth of Chinese national power induced the United States that had preferred to maintain hegemonic power status to restrain and contain China. In contrast, China also began to adopt internal and external measures to make balance with the U.S. power by building strong military capabilities and creating alliance with other states like Russia. Second, the case of China-Japan territorial dispute also confirms that stiff national power growth of China played significant role in intensifying China-Japan dispute. However, the issue of Japanese "past affairs" also provided amplification impact on the bilateral dispute. The North Korea nuclear weapon case indicated that such domestic political and economic factors as maintenance of political power and economic crisis played important role in leading international conflicts among East Asian states. Thus, it is confirmed that not only change of power distribution but also some cognitive and domestic factors like "past affairs" and "economic crisis" have determined conflicts or disputes among East Asian States.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미·중 경쟁관계
Ⅲ. 중·일 갈등관계
Ⅳ. 제 2차 북핵분쟁
Ⅴ. 결론: 동아시아 국가들의 선호정책 비교와 전망
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001210499