지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In general, the scholarship on Park Eun-sik has evaluated his nationalist historiography positively in the context of historical peculiarities of Japanese colonialisation. This article examines the meaning and limits of park`s historical writing on Goguryeo in order to place it in a more objective perspective.
Park`s monographs, Myeonglimdapbujeon and Cheongaesomunjeon, historical biographies, take an expatiatory format mainly in the perspective of the enlightenment. This format can be categorised in between historica writings land novel, which shows descriptions diverged from historical facts. Also, following limits can be found: heroism with an emphasis on the spiritual features of history, and modern historiography`s orientation towards objectivity and positivity. However, these features can be regarded a close intimacy with the historical peculiarities which are commonly found in the contemporary nationalist historiography.
Recently found contents related to the Myeonglimdapbu in Shin`s Daedongyeoksa seem to be written by him in reference to Park`s Myeonlimdapbujeon. Daedongyeoksa directly cites Myeonlimdapbujeon, while some parts are edited with summary. Although three lies dangers to reveal the connection between Park and Shin with single material, it can be said that a great deal of influence from Shin upon Park can be found for now. The discovery of Daedongyeoksa provides an opportunity to review the relationship between the two figures, while recent studies still remains on the contributions on the establishment of modern historiography ?a simple succession and development of Shin by Park.
Park`s monographs, Myeonglimdapbujeon and Cheongaesomunjeon, historical biographies, take an expatiatory format mainly in the perspective of the enlightenment. This format can be categorised in between historica writings land novel, which shows descriptions diverged from historical facts. Also, following limits can be found: heroism with an emphasis on the spiritual features of history, and modern historiography`s orientation towards objectivity and positivity. However, these features can be regarded a close intimacy with the historical peculiarities which are commonly found in the contemporary nationalist historiography.
Recently found contents related to the Myeonglimdapbu in Shin`s Daedongyeoksa seem to be written by him in reference to Park`s Myeonlimdapbujeon. Daedongyeoksa directly cites Myeonlimdapbujeon, while some parts are edited with summary. Although three lies dangers to reveal the connection between Park and Shin with single material, it can be said that a great deal of influence from Shin upon Park can be found for now. The discovery of Daedongyeoksa provides an opportunity to review the relationship between the two figures, while recent studies still remains on the contributions on the establishment of modern historiography ?a simple succession and development of Shin by Park.
목차
1. 서론
2. 백암 박은식의 고구려 인식과 고구려사 서술
3. 백암의 『明臨答夫傳』과 단재의 『大東歷史』 의 관계
4. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001388412