지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第221輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.3
- 수록면
- 3 - 31 (29page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/khr.2014.03.221.3
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
China and Japan led the silver trade in east Asia since the 16th century. China was the world’s biggest silver importing country and Japan was Asia’s biggest silver exporting country. Joseon was influenced by these two in the silver trade, although only after late 17th century they allowed the international silver trade. At the time as China’s southeast coastal route deteriorated, the silver circulation route was most vibrant via Joseon en route to China’s northeast. At this time Joseon actively exploited the silver that was coming in large quantity from Japan for Chinese diplomacy and trade. Joseon wished to replace the indigenous products to silver for the annual tribute to China, and spent silver for the diplomacy expenses as well. However, above all most imported silver was utilized as the trade fund. As silver was utilized as the trade transaction means, beyond the ruling class’s luxury items production or the diplomacy expenses, Joseon grew up to be one of the principal agents in the east Asia silver trade system. The silver trade system positively contributed to the east Asian economy development, but in the late 18th century drastically shrank and faced the crisis. Each country had to respond either by expediting the domestic production of the imports or by developing new trade products.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 인식과 상황의 전환
Ⅲ. 동아시아 은 교역 체제
Ⅳ. 은 유통의 여파
Ⅴ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0