지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Overall, what New Rhetoric try to pursue is the term, "Diversity". This is the contrary term of the "Univocity" with which the traditional occidental philosophy have been presented. The cause New Rhetoric can try to claim the "Diversity" is because of the Sophist of Athens. Therefore, it seems that we should research the thought of Protagoras who is designated as one of the well-known Sophists. And, New Rhetoric is not about the discussion of the "Res", but about the one of the "Human". So, New Rhetoric would want to reject the previous discussion of the "Res", concurrently to concenter about the argument of the "Human".
As above, I suggested that the New Rhetoric is largely the study of which it deal with the two terms, "Diversity" and "Human". The scholar group that inaugurate the New Rhetoric is called "Belgian school", and the most eminent scholar is "Chaim Perelman". Thus, in my thesis, I will argue about the Perelman"s argumentation of the "Diversity" and "Human", and especially about how he try to unfold the argument of "Diversity" and "Human". At the same time, in order to be plentiful on arguing the two terms, I will plan to draw the four philosophers, that is to say Protagoras, Merleau-Pont, Nietzsche, and Thomas S. Kuhn.
But, I think that even if the two terms linked to the New Rhetoric are argued by Perelman and the four philosophers in my thesis, the abstraction of the thesis having the thesis-itself wouldn"t be overcome. So, to overcome the abstraction, I will try to write my thesis through the important word, "hardness" and "softness". Because the hardness and the softness is the word feeling easily and routinely.
Perhaps, the readers reading the thesis seems that they can easily understand the sense of hardness designating the deductive system and demonstration. Further more, I will expect that they perceive the hardness of the system deduction and the demonstration being originated from the "Univocity". It is the reason that I should try to draw up the thesis.
As above, I suggested that the New Rhetoric is largely the study of which it deal with the two terms, "Diversity" and "Human". The scholar group that inaugurate the New Rhetoric is called "Belgian school", and the most eminent scholar is "Chaim Perelman". Thus, in my thesis, I will argue about the Perelman"s argumentation of the "Diversity" and "Human", and especially about how he try to unfold the argument of "Diversity" and "Human". At the same time, in order to be plentiful on arguing the two terms, I will plan to draw the four philosophers, that is to say Protagoras, Merleau-Pont, Nietzsche, and Thomas S. Kuhn.
But, I think that even if the two terms linked to the New Rhetoric are argued by Perelman and the four philosophers in my thesis, the abstraction of the thesis having the thesis-itself wouldn"t be overcome. So, to overcome the abstraction, I will try to write my thesis through the important word, "hardness" and "softness". Because the hardness and the softness is the word feeling easily and routinely.
Perhaps, the readers reading the thesis seems that they can easily understand the sense of hardness designating the deductive system and demonstration. Further more, I will expect that they perceive the hardness of the system deduction and the demonstration being originated from the "Univocity". It is the reason that I should try to draw up the thesis.
목차
Ⅰ. 페를만의 ‘연역 체계와 증명’에 대한 비판 : 삼단논법의 ‘딱딱함’에 대한 분석
Ⅱ. 연역 체계 및 증명의 비판: ‘딱딱함’과 ‘형식화’를 중심으로
Ⅲ. 다양성과 철학 및 수사학의 위상
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
"말"과 "글"의 커뮤니케이션을 넘어 : 사회체계로서 커뮤니케이션
이남복
사회이론
2004
.06
한국 코미디영화 형성기의 담론분석 : 텍스트의 사회역사적 의미를 중심으로
김대근
씨네포럼
2016
.12
메를로 퐁티와 푸코를 통한 스포츠폭력의 철학적 사유(思惟)
안병수
,
고영완
,
김인홍
한국체육과학회지
2016
.10
한국 민주주의의 품질 : 민주화가 정체된 결함 있는 민주주의
김용철
현대정치연구
2016
.10
Gender Identity and the Performativity of Language : The Rhetoric of Trauma in Diagnostic Medicine
Jon
,
Bumsoo
수사학
2016
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-001452281