지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As a result of checking constitutional issues, the conclusion is that (1) The opinion that holding chairman of National science and technology council of president is unconstitutional because that is against Constitution of the republic of Korea, Article 83 (a ban for holding more than one office) and invasion of the overall supervision right of Prime Minister, is not convincing. (2) but codes those are apprehended that transubstantiate the council to intrinsic administrative agency, are must be improved.
In course of constitutional adjudication, if some legislation has two conflicting aspects (constitutional and unconstitutional), that must be interpreted constitutional because of the principle that presume legislation to be constitutional. And the desirability of policy like this is not the subject of judical judgement but the subject of legislator. These things considered, installing National science and technology council under president and holding chairman of National science and technology council(NSTC) of president is not unconstitutional on the assumption the the revised bill must be improved. But questions remain about whether the act like this is desirable or nor in aspect of consitutional policy. Therefore National Assembly as the representative of policy must earnestly answer the question.
In course of constitutional adjudication, if some legislation has two conflicting aspects (constitutional and unconstitutional), that must be interpreted constitutional because of the principle that presume legislation to be constitutional. And the desirability of policy like this is not the subject of judical judgement but the subject of legislator. These things considered, installing National science and technology council under president and holding chairman of National science and technology council(NSTC) of president is not unconstitutional on the assumption the the revised bill must be improved. But questions remain about whether the act like this is desirable or nor in aspect of consitutional policy. Therefore National Assembly as the representative of policy must earnestly answer the question.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 헌법상 대통령의 겸직금지에 관한 일반론
Ⅲ. 정부위원회 제도와 국가과학기술위원회의 법적 성격
Ⅳ. 과학기술기본법 일부개정법률안의 주요내용 및 헌법적 쟁점
Ⅴ. 대통령의 과학기술위원회 위원장 겸직에 관한 헌법적 검토
Ⅵ. 대통령의 과학기술위원회 위원장의 겸직과 국무총리의 국정 통할권
Ⅶ. 위원회의 조직법리적 검토
Ⅷ. `개정법률안`의 위헌적 측면과 개선방안
Ⅸ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002484080