지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.8
- 수록면
- 846 - 858 (13page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to help domestic aquaculture farm by improved evaluation method.
First, We analyzed evaluation method of domestic aquaculture certification, the greater retailer’s supplier and global standard.
Next, By using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), We found priority and importance between criteria of SQF(Safety Quality Food) standard which is appled to alternative model for aquaculture evaluation.
As a result is presented as follows: regarding pairwise comparison between System Element module and Good Aquaculture Practice(GAP) module, GAP is recognized to be more important than System Element.
The highest priority criteria is presented ‘Purchase and Use of Medications, Aquaculture Feeds and Aquaculture Chemicals.’ Next, ‘Management commitment’, ‘Attaining Food Safety’, ‘Location and Layout of Structures and Vessels’, ‘Stock Identification and Traceability are recognized high position.
This study has major implications for research into development of evaluation method.
First, We analyzed evaluation method of domestic aquaculture certification, the greater retailer’s supplier and global standard.
Next, By using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), We found priority and importance between criteria of SQF(Safety Quality Food) standard which is appled to alternative model for aquaculture evaluation.
As a result is presented as follows: regarding pairwise comparison between System Element module and Good Aquaculture Practice(GAP) module, GAP is recognized to be more important than System Element.
The highest priority criteria is presented ‘Purchase and Use of Medications, Aquaculture Feeds and Aquaculture Chemicals.’ Next, ‘Management commitment’, ‘Attaining Food Safety’, ‘Location and Layout of Structures and Vessels’, ‘Stock Identification and Traceability are recognized high position.
This study has major implications for research into development of evaluation method.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 평가방식에 대한 사례분석
Ⅲ. 평가기준 모델 선정 및 AHP적용
Ⅳ. 결론
References
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
An, Jin-Sung / 2010 / The Evaluation Criteria of Preservation Condition for the Historic Garden through Delphi Technique & Analytic Hierarchy Process
ASC / 2013 / Standard Version 1.0
BAP / 2014 / Certification Standards Guidelines Version 2
Ben, Belton / 2011 / Certifying catfish in Vietnam and Bangladesh: Who will make the grade and will it matter? / Flsevier(Food policy) 36:289~299
COSTCO / 2005 / Supplier Assessment Audit Report Vision 5.3
ASC / 2013 / Standard Version 1.0
BAP / 2014 / Certification Standards Guidelines Version 2
Ben, Belton / 2011 / Certifying catfish in Vietnam and Bangladesh: Who will make the grade and will it matter? / Flsevier(Food policy) 36:289~299
COSTCO / 2005 / Supplier Assessment Audit Report Vision 5.3
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002607610