지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 196 (196page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study seeks to find a new direction for agricultural structure policy focused on rice farming structure. Specific focuses of this study are as the followings. First, the necessity of directional transition of the current agricultural structure policy is reviewed. Second, the feasibility of new direction of agricultural structure policy is considered. Lastly, a new direction and measures of agricultural structure policy are provided.
This study reviewed the necessity of directional transition of the current agricultural structure policy through three perspectives. First, the current agricultural structure policy encourages each farmer to increase acreage leading to high productivity of inputs (labor and land), growth of farm size (more than 3 ha), and spread of mechanization in farming. However, it did not accomplish fundamental policy goals. An increase of farming scale of individual farmers does not necessarily result in an increase of overall farming scale. Issues with respect to insecurity of farming succession and inefficient application of inputs such as labor, machines, and land are the other problems. An effort to increase income accrued in non-agriculture and by-work is more efficient than an increase of agricultural income through an expansion of farming size. Second, a development of foreign agricultural structure policy shows a transition from farming-size increase of family farmers to juridical organization of farmers. It also shows a policy transition from agricultural productivity increase to promotion of multi-functionality of agriculture regarding regions, resources, environments, and food safety. Third, due to recent changes in domestic and foreign agricultural situation, there are several issues to be clarified. The issues include (1) re-adjustment of agricultural production infrastructure to achieve food security, (2) income security of crop and livestock feed farming, (3) organization of region-unit farming business to aim enhancement of both price and quality competitiveness, (4) usage-extension of eco-friendly agriculture and new recycled energy supporting prevention of natural disasters, (5) support for entry into agriculture and farming corporations in the face of both reduction of young labor and increase of aged labor in rural areas, and (6) promotion of combined and diversified farming to achieve security of rice farmers’ income.
Next, this study performed a case study of corporate enterprises of rural communities in Korea, Japan, and China to find the feasibility of new direction of agricultural structure policy. Corporate enterprises of rural communities at regional level cannot replace family farms, but they complement family farms. Furthermore, they are effective in joint work, joint usage of agricultural machines and facilities, joint marketing, and extension of farming scale.
Lastly, this study proposed a new direction of agricultural structure policy as the followings: (1) transition into institutionalization and organization of family farms from policies focused on increase of individual farm size, (2) increase of corporate enterprises of rural communities at regional level, and (3) conversion from enlargement of agricultural income through farm size increase to enlargement of non-agricultural income through combined and diversified farming.
This study reviewed the necessity of directional transition of the current agricultural structure policy through three perspectives. First, the current agricultural structure policy encourages each farmer to increase acreage leading to high productivity of inputs (labor and land), growth of farm size (more than 3 ha), and spread of mechanization in farming. However, it did not accomplish fundamental policy goals. An increase of farming scale of individual farmers does not necessarily result in an increase of overall farming scale. Issues with respect to insecurity of farming succession and inefficient application of inputs such as labor, machines, and land are the other problems. An effort to increase income accrued in non-agriculture and by-work is more efficient than an increase of agricultural income through an expansion of farming size. Second, a development of foreign agricultural structure policy shows a transition from farming-size increase of family farmers to juridical organization of farmers. It also shows a policy transition from agricultural productivity increase to promotion of multi-functionality of agriculture regarding regions, resources, environments, and food safety. Third, due to recent changes in domestic and foreign agricultural situation, there are several issues to be clarified. The issues include (1) re-adjustment of agricultural production infrastructure to achieve food security, (2) income security of crop and livestock feed farming, (3) organization of region-unit farming business to aim enhancement of both price and quality competitiveness, (4) usage-extension of eco-friendly agriculture and new recycled energy supporting prevention of natural disasters, (5) support for entry into agriculture and farming corporations in the face of both reduction of young labor and increase of aged labor in rural areas, and (6) promotion of combined and diversified farming to achieve security of rice farmers’ income.
Next, this study performed a case study of corporate enterprises of rural communities in Korea, Japan, and China to find the feasibility of new direction of agricultural structure policy. Corporate enterprises of rural communities at regional level cannot replace family farms, but they complement family farms. Furthermore, they are effective in joint work, joint usage of agricultural machines and facilities, joint marketing, and extension of farming scale.
Lastly, this study proposed a new direction of agricultural structure policy as the followings: (1) transition into institutionalization and organization of family farms from policies focused on increase of individual farm size, (2) increase of corporate enterprises of rural communities at regional level, and (3) conversion from enlargement of agricultural income through farm size increase to enlargement of non-agricultural income through combined and diversified farming.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 필요성과 목적
2. 선행연구 검토
3. 연구 범위와 연구 내용
4. 연구방법
[제2장 농업구조정책의 개념과 범위]
1. 농업구조의 개념
2. 농업구조정책의 개념과 범위
[제3장 농업구조정책의 추진 경과와 실적]
1. 농업구조정책의 배경과 경과
2. 1990년대 이후 농업구조정책의 추진 실적
3. 소결 : 정책의 질적 전환 미흡한 양적 확대
[제4장 농업구조정책의 성과 평가와 과제]
1. 농업구조정책의 평가 방법
2. 농업구조정책의 정책체계에 대한 평가
3. 농업구조정책의 목표 달성도에 대한 평가
4. 농업구조정책의 문제점 및 정책과제
[제5장 외국의 농업구조정책 동향]
1. 유럽연합(EU)의 공동농업정책과 지역정책
2. 프랑스의 농업구조정책과 조직경영체
3. 일본의 농업구조정책 추이와 집락영농
4. 중국의 쌀산업 계열화
5. 외국 농업구조정책의 시사점
[제6장 농업구조정책의 전환 방향과 정책체계]
1. 농업구조정책 전환의 필요성
2. 농업구조정책의 전환 방향
3. 농업구조정책의 정책수단
[제7장 요약 및 결론]
(1) 연구의 필요성과 목적
(2) 농업구조정책의 개념과 범위
(3) 농업구조정책의 추진 경과와 실적
(4) 농업구조정책의 성과 평가와 과제
(5) 외국 농업구조정책의 전개과정과 시사점
(6) 농업구조정책의 전환 방향과 체계
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002536370