메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第131輯
발행연도
2014.9
수록면
67 - 102 (36page)
DOI
10.18622/kher.2014.09.131.67

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
‘Sequencing History Education’ actually means systematization of learning contents of elementary, middle and high school history curriculum. And differentiation strategies for classification in outward appearance is not quite the point of ‘Sequencing.’ Distinct differences found in history education contents for each tri-level school, could be the result of specialized contents formation based on the aims of elementary, middle and high school history education.
‘Sequencing History Education’ demands the multi-pronged efforts for systematization of learning contents; hierarchy of instructional objectives, plans for ‘doing history’ step-by-step, characterized learning topics and so on. Empirically, formal logic claim to stand for sequencing is largely meaningless and should be discouraged; for example, the standard of “life history for elementarypolitical history for middlesocial economy, and cultural history for high school” has proven empirically inefficient, impractical and even harmful to ‘Sequencing History Education’. It requires a more judicious approach to applying the new standards or methods for ‘Sequencing History Education’.
If we hope some fruitful discussion and substantial amendments in ‘Sequencing History Education’, we should rely on the power of collective intelligence of academic and educational world. More important, however, is the greater political will for reasonable and collaborative system for curriculum development.

목차

1. 여는 글
2. ‘계열화’ 논의의 국면들
3. 초등학교 ‘사회’ 한국사 내용 구성의 문제점과 개선 방안
4. 중ㆍ고등학교 한국사 내용 구성의 문제점과 개선 방안
5. 맺는 글
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-370-002736690