지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 40 (40page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The period when the maritime route was opened between Korea and China in the Yellow Sea was since the arising of the ancient nation. The necessity of a maritime route in the Yellow Sea is related to the mass transportation of freight. To properly understand the maritime route in the era of Koryo and Song Dynasty, it should be reviewed from the perspectives of the continuity of a maritime route and the use of the route. Firstly, the traverse maritime route of Koryo and Song Dynasty in Yellow Sea was a successor of a maritime route that had been developed and used since the ancient times. Therefore, rather than uniformly classifying the maritime route of Koryo and Song Dynasty into the times of North Song and South Song, it is appropriate to view that the route had a main route and a sub route depending on the specific period. Typically in the case of the traverse maritime route of Yellow Sea, in the time of Koryo and Song Dynasty, the route travelled across Dengzhou of Song, which was used since the era of Silla until that time, or through Mizhou, or even went to South Song of Ningbo across the Yellow Sea.
Next, due to the growth of the Kitan in the time of Koryo and Song Dynasty, the southern route of Yellow Sea had been used as the main route since the year of 1088. Such fact is also described in detail in the like books of Koryo Dogyeong by Xu Jing. The reasons behind the development of the southern route of Yellow Sea include the economic development in the south region of the river in South Song and the need to sell various products in Koryo due to the aggressive trade policy of Song Dynasty.
However, other than the traverse maritime route and the southern maritime route of Yellow Sea, the southern maritime route that travelled via Jeju Island also had an important function in the time of Koryo and Song Dynasty. The island that belonged to Korea since the ancient times had an important location not only in the exchange between Koryo and Song Dynasty, but also in the exchange between Japan and Song Dynasty. Jeju Island was not only a travel stop in the route or the supplier of drinking water, but also functioned as part of the southern maritime route that travelled to South Song via Jeju. In special, this route was a route that received attentions as a maritime route for emergency or private trade.
Generally, the traverse route and the southern maritime route of Yellow Sea in the time of Koryo and Song Dynasty are understood in the way that the traverse maritime route of Yellow Sea was used but then the route was changed to the southern maritime route depending on the political and the diplomatic situations of the times of North Song and South Song. However, while the national envoys and public trades used fixed routes by changing them to reflect political situations, it should be seen that the merchants and the private trades still kept using the routes that had been used previously depending on their needs.
Next, due to the growth of the Kitan in the time of Koryo and Song Dynasty, the southern route of Yellow Sea had been used as the main route since the year of 1088. Such fact is also described in detail in the like books of Koryo Dogyeong by Xu Jing. The reasons behind the development of the southern route of Yellow Sea include the economic development in the south region of the river in South Song and the need to sell various products in Koryo due to the aggressive trade policy of Song Dynasty.
However, other than the traverse maritime route and the southern maritime route of Yellow Sea, the southern maritime route that travelled via Jeju Island also had an important function in the time of Koryo and Song Dynasty. The island that belonged to Korea since the ancient times had an important location not only in the exchange between Koryo and Song Dynasty, but also in the exchange between Japan and Song Dynasty. Jeju Island was not only a travel stop in the route or the supplier of drinking water, but also functioned as part of the southern maritime route that travelled to South Song via Jeju. In special, this route was a route that received attentions as a maritime route for emergency or private trade.
Generally, the traverse route and the southern maritime route of Yellow Sea in the time of Koryo and Song Dynasty are understood in the way that the traverse maritime route of Yellow Sea was used but then the route was changed to the southern maritime route depending on the political and the diplomatic situations of the times of North Song and South Song. However, while the national envoys and public trades used fixed routes by changing them to reflect political situations, it should be seen that the merchants and the private trades still kept using the routes that had been used previously depending on their needs.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 黃海橫斷海上航路의 형성과 활용
Ⅲ. 南方海上航路의 형성과 활용
Ⅳ. 濟州島經由南方海上航路의 형성과 활용
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (54)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강봉룡 / 2006 / 신라 말∼고려시대 서남해지역의 한·중 해상교통로와 거점포구 / 韓國史學報 (23) : 381 ~ 401
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 高柄翊 / 1991 / 麗代동아시아의 해상통교 / 진단학보 71․72 : 298 ~ 309
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 高橋公明 / 2002 / 해역세계 가운데 제주도와 고려 / 도서문화 20 : 245 ~ 262
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金庠基 / 1937 / 麗宋貿易小考 / 진단학보 7
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金庠基 / 1959 / 海商의 활동과 문물의 교류 / 국사상의 제문제 4
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 高柄翊 / 1991 / 麗代동아시아의 해상통교 / 진단학보 71․72 : 298 ~ 309
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 高橋公明 / 2002 / 해역세계 가운데 제주도와 고려 / 도서문화 20 : 245 ~ 262
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金庠基 / 1937 / 麗宋貿易小考 / 진단학보 7
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金庠基 / 1959 / 海商의 활동과 문물의 교류 / 국사상의 제문제 4
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
남북국시대의 對中항로와 거점
윤재운
한국사연구
2017
.12
4세기 전반 고구려의 해양활동과 황해 : 고구려와 후조 · 모용선비의 관계를 중심으로
이정빈
역사와실학
2016
.04
Jabgwa Bangmok and Extending the Boundary of Korean Studies
Lee
,
Nam-hee
장서각
2014
.10
조선 말기 명과학 시험교재 『선택기요』 연구
이수동
장서각
2014
.10
A Remedy for the World: an Eschatological Dimension of a Quasi-religion, Communism and its Application in a Central European Country, Hungary
Áb
,
ahám Kovács
종교연구
2014
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-330-002714174