메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
김형섭 (중앙대학교)
저널정보
한국노어노문학회 한국노어노문학회 학술대회 발표집 한국노어노문학회 L.톨스토이 서거 100주년 기념 국제학술대회: 톨스토이 연구의 세가지 관점
발행연도
2010.11
수록면
332 - 349 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper investigates the syntactic structure of impersonal constructions, i.e., absolute, dative, and accusative impersonal sentences, on the basis of the assumption that there is a null expletive subject phonologically invisible on the specifier of TP. This approach is in contrast to the Russian tradition disapproving of a covert syntactic subject in nominative. This research is based on Burzio’s Generalization that a verb (with an object) case-marks its object if and only if it theta-marks its subject. In accusative impersonal sentences, like in personal sentences, the light verb little v possesses a full set of phi-features and T is not a defective functional category, which has EPP(Extended Projection Principle), [nom] case, and uninterpretable [utense:] features. Being a functional category responsible for tense, nominative case, and EPP, T serves for syntactic derivation as Probe, which searches for its Goal with nominal features. This mechanism is called “Agree”, in which interpretable and uninterpretable features are shared reciprocally and valued among them. The reason why a subject on the specifier of TP in impersonal sentences does not spell out phonologically overtly is that it does not satisfy the Visibility Condition that case [case:] and referentiality [+/-Ref] features must be marked in order to be visible for an argument. In the case of Russian accusative impersonal sentences, these two requirements of [nom] and [-Ref] features prevent arguments from spelling out overtly. With regard to the position of a subject, the initial merge of a subject occurs on the specifier of VP and later moves up to the specifier of vP to receive a theta-role of [agent] or stay in the initial position without move (in-situ). Russian accusative impersonal sentences are different from unaccusative sentences in that the latter have a nominative subject, which originates from an internal complement within VP, while the former have a nominative subject, which cannot spell out phonologically due to the failure to satisfy the Visibility Condition. The lack of a nominative subject triggers the use of default agreement for Subject-Predicate Agreement. Default agreement is the last resort to solve non-agreeing cases between subjects and predicates. Default agreement is one of the two types of formal agreement: one is grammatical agreement [+AGR/+Ref] and default agreement [+AGR/-Ref]. Semantic agreement [-AGR] occurs due to semantic factors between an agreement controller and an agreement target. Furthermore, accusative impersonal verbs cannot form their own participles or gerunds. However, Covert null expletive subjects in impersonal verbs can serve as a controller of gerunds used in a subordinate clause. The use of gerunds entails the existence of their controllers in the matrix clause, since gerunds can be used only when subjects in gerundive clauses are the same as those of main clauses. The controllability over gerunds firmly supports the assumption that there is a phonologically covert null expletive subject in nominative.

목차

서론
본론
결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0