지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, the comparison between the first Abe administration and the present Abe administration will be analyzed. The main differences focused on the two points: political policy and economic policy. The one point of the focus is evaluated by political aspects using foreign policy, constitutional reform and historical awareness. The other point is based on the economy growth policy and fiscal consolidation policy for the economic aspects.
It should be noted that Abe administration have been maintained the correlation with US continuously and strongly. The first administration had relatively took a friendly relationship with China and South Korea till 2007 compared to the second administration. However, the attitude of foreign policy was changed dramatically when the second administration was started. The present prime minister of Abe had the visit to Yasukuni Shrine on 2013, and this performance was enough to evoke the repulsive opinion from the governments of China and South Korea. Even though there was no outstanding achievement in reforming article 9 during the past administration, present administration generates new interpretation with the same article under the name of interpretation of amendment. Based on this amendment, present Abe administration obtained the right of collective self-defense with their enhanced status. Moreover, Conservative revision of historical textbook has been enhanced further compared with the past administration.
On the economy growth policy aspects, the first government did not provide a clear commitment and a decent performance. However, the present government clearly showed the improved commitments called “Abenomics”. It is noticeable that confident economic policies and improved economic conditions is considered the main reason of why present Abe administration is still achieving stable voters’ support. On the other hand, quantitative easing policy of Abenomics causes an increase of debt and deficit.
It should be noted that Abe administration have been maintained the correlation with US continuously and strongly. The first administration had relatively took a friendly relationship with China and South Korea till 2007 compared to the second administration. However, the attitude of foreign policy was changed dramatically when the second administration was started. The present prime minister of Abe had the visit to Yasukuni Shrine on 2013, and this performance was enough to evoke the repulsive opinion from the governments of China and South Korea. Even though there was no outstanding achievement in reforming article 9 during the past administration, present administration generates new interpretation with the same article under the name of interpretation of amendment. Based on this amendment, present Abe administration obtained the right of collective self-defense with their enhanced status. Moreover, Conservative revision of historical textbook has been enhanced further compared with the past administration.
On the economy growth policy aspects, the first government did not provide a clear commitment and a decent performance. However, the present government clearly showed the improved commitments called “Abenomics”. It is noticeable that confident economic policies and improved economic conditions is considered the main reason of why present Abe administration is still achieving stable voters’ support. On the other hand, quantitative easing policy of Abenomics causes an increase of debt and deficit.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 아베정권의 정치정책 변화
Ⅲ. 아베정권의 경제정책 변화
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-910-001088619