지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제28호
- 발행연도
- 2011.4
- 수록면
- 279 - 288 (10page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2011.4.28.279
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Anderson begins his study by presenting that the metaphor on sin in the Hebrew Bible has changed since the Second Temple period. While its principal metaphors in the Classical Biblical Hebrew literature are the burden to be borne (Lev 16:22) or the stain to be wiped, the main metaphor on sin is represented as a debt (Isa 40:2) to be payed in the later period, i.e., in the New Testament (Rom 7:14; Col 2:14), the rabbinic literature, and the early Christian literature (St. Ephrem, Narsai). And this change of sin"s concept is confirmed by the translation of the word "burden" by "debt" in the Aramaic Targum (Lev 5:1; 24:15). According to the author, the emergence of this new concept of sin as a burden derives from the influence of the Aramaic language in the Persian period (538-533 B.C). On the basis of this hypothesis, Anderson tries to unveil the relationship between sin as a debt and almsgiving as a crucial means of an atonement.
The author"s interest is so wide as to range from the Old and New Testament, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the rabbinic literature to the Syriac theologians. However, he does not lose his sight any moment on the theme "sin". By trying to interpret sin and atonement in these wide perspectives, he makes the reader not to be isolated in a particular biased position. Anderson does not merely solve the reader"s curiosity on the history of sin; he shows an excellent model how the exegete can draw the theological inferences out through the linguistic approach.
The author"s interest is so wide as to range from the Old and New Testament, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the rabbinic literature to the Syriac theologians. However, he does not lose his sight any moment on the theme "sin". By trying to interpret sin and atonement in these wide perspectives, he makes the reader not to be isolated in a particular biased position. Anderson does not merely solve the reader"s curiosity on the history of sin; he shows an excellent model how the exegete can draw the theological inferences out through the linguistic approach.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 1부
3. 2부
4. 3부
5. 평가
참고문헌(References)
Abstract
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박미섭 / 2010 / <서평> A History of the Hebrew Language 샌즈 바딜로스(Angel Sáenz-Badillos) 엘울드(J. F. Elwolde) 영어판 역 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996, 371p. / Canon&Culture(캐논앤컬처) 4 (1) : 277 ~ 285
2. [단행본] - 이은재 / 2007 / 인간이 되신 하나님 / 한들출판사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이수민 / 2008 / 마르 에프렘의 사마리아 여인과 헤라클레온 단편들 / 신학전망 (161) : 93 ~ 115
4. [단행본] - 이수민 / 2010 / 마르 에프렘의 낙원의 찬가 / 한님성서연구소
5. [단행본] - Janowski,B / 1982 / Sühne als Heilsgeschehen: Traditions- und religionsgeschichtlicheStudien zur Sühnetheologie der Priesterschrift, WMANT 55 / Neukirchener
2. [단행본] - 이은재 / 2007 / 인간이 되신 하나님 / 한들출판사
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이수민 / 2008 / 마르 에프렘의 사마리아 여인과 헤라클레온 단편들 / 신학전망 (161) : 93 ~ 115
4. [단행본] - 이수민 / 2010 / 마르 에프렘의 낙원의 찬가 / 한님성서연구소
5. [단행본] - Janowski,B / 1982 / Sühne als Heilsgeschehen: Traditions- und religionsgeschichtlicheStudien zur Sühnetheologie der Priesterschrift, WMANT 55 / Neukirchener
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-001304025