지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제34호
- 발행연도
- 2014.4
- 수록면
- 110 - 127 (18page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2014.4.34.110
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, I try to suggest a new (Korean) translation and interpretation of a participial phrase, μ? μ?μαθηκ??, in John 7:15. In Korean Bible versions, the participial phrase, μ? μ?μαθηκ??, is rendered as if it is a concessive clause. And based on this translation, many preachers and students have cited this phrase as the verse evidencing Jesus’ omnisciency on earth. However, John 7:15 and its context neither talks about his omnisciency, nor is the participial phrase translated to connote concession. In fact, John 7:15 is in a context of an issue of Jesus" teacher, and the participial phrase should be understood in a conditional sense. Particularly, the writer of the Gospel of John is likely to have followed (or imitated) the classical usage of the negation of (adverbial) participle, i.e. μ? +participle implying condition) and ouv+participle (implying the rest of the adverbial clause), which is supported by other examples in the Gospel of John (e.g. Joh. 10:12; 12:48; 15:2). In addition, when we consider Jesus" reply in verse 16 (“My teaching is not mine but his who sent me” NRS]), which informs who Jesus" teacher is, but not his education level, the question of Jews in verse 15 should be interpreted in the same line as the reply, i.e. an issue of Jesus" teacher. As the result, while the participial phrase negated with μ?, in verse 16 should be rendered in the conditional sense, the π?? question has to be understood as a deliberative question.
목차
1. 서론
2. 문법적 설명 및 요한복음의 문체
3. 문맥적 의미
4. 결론
참고문헌(References)
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-001304898