메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
장채욱 (인천대학교) 정미미 (강릉원주대학교) 성창훈 (인천대학교)
저널정보
한국여성체육학회 한국여성체육학회지 한국여성체육학회지 제29권 제1호
발행연도
2015.03
수록면
91 - 103 (13page)
DOI
10.16915/jkapesgw.2015.03.29.1.91

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to introduce the problem of the reliability of the estimated composite score. Reliability analysis is a widely used statistical method in the area of psychology. Many researchers have employed it to analyze data because reliability is the important indicator that represents the internal consistency of data. However, many ignored the importance of reliability, further viewed it as a simple statistic method. In this study, we investigated sport psychology researches that evaluated the reliability of the items used primarily for application of alpha coefficients. We described the alpha coefficients of internal consistency, how to measure it and interpret the meaning of the problem. Furthermore, we brought the issue regarding the reliability measurement model in terms of the estimation of Cronbach’s alpha application and briefly compared it with an example. Alpha coefficients that have been published through the Korean Journal of Sport Psychology research were used for this study. To investigate the reliability and the use of sport psychological tests from 2010 to May 2013 published in the Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, we reviewed methodologies in those selected papers. For all sport psychological test, the reliability was average .802 (sd= .094). Respectively, exercise psychology research design was .820 (sd= .091) and sport psychology research design was .794 (sd=.093). In addition, we found that those papers had some errors in terms of the reliability analysis procedures and interpretations of results. We discussed these problems based on psychometrics.

목차

ABSTRACT
I. 서론
II. 신뢰도 실증분석
III. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-692-001309374