지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It was the King or the royal who drove compilation of history publications during Three Kingdom Period. Even in the case of Silla, where it was recorded that Yisabu petitioned the king to compile one, it appears that the history publication reflects the will of the royal. In that regards, we would need to acknowledge that publications such as Sinjip(New Compilation), compiled by Lee Moon-jin per the order of King Youngyang of Koguryo, or Seogi(Documentary Records), written during the reign of King Kun Chogo of Paekche, are the direct product of the will of the royal. The view is persuasive if we take into account the fact that the kings ordered publication of the history books out of discontent after reading existing written records on the royalty. Sinjip(New Compilation) is a vivid example in particular.
In the case of Silla, it is fair to focus on the role of Chisotaehoo, regardless of the fact that Yisabu’s petition initiatied the national history compilation. The fact that Keochilbu was promoted in his rank within Kwandung system in recognition of his feat in compiling Kuksa(National History) suggests that the publication upholds perspective of the royal. Therefore, it would be fair to say that king’s power heavily influenced compilation of history books in each of Three Kingdoms. In other words, influence of power of the state, king’s power in particular, over compilation of history books, was more significant during Three Kingdom Period than any other periods in Korean history.
In the case of Silla, it is fair to focus on the role of Chisotaehoo, regardless of the fact that Yisabu’s petition initiatied the national history compilation. The fact that Keochilbu was promoted in his rank within Kwandung system in recognition of his feat in compiling Kuksa(National History) suggests that the publication upholds perspective of the royal. Therefore, it would be fair to say that king’s power heavily influenced compilation of history books in each of Three Kingdoms. In other words, influence of power of the state, king’s power in particular, over compilation of history books, was more significant during Three Kingdom Period than any other periods in Korean history.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 高句麗의 『留記』·『新集』 편찬과 왕권
Ⅲ. 百濟의 『書記』 편찬과 왕권
Ⅳ. 新羅의 『國史』 편찬과 왕권
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
국방역사서 편찬에 관한 연구
군사연구
2020 .01
-
고구려의 修史와 『留記』·『新集』－왜국 修史와의 비교를 위한 전제(Ⅰ)－
한국사학보
2021 .08
-
공주대학교의 <70년사> 간행
역사와 담론
2022 .10
-
권력과 기록
동아시아고대학
2017 .01
-
신라 중고기 영토 확장과 정치집단의 역동적 대응
역사학연구
2020 .01
-
The Fundamental Studies Concerning Classical Chinese Literature and the Associated Compilation of Texts with Collected Commentaries during the Reign of Sejong
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
최근 대만 역사교과서의 한국사 인식 변화 - 101과강 『선수역사(選修歷史)』와 108과강 『역사(歷史)2』 비교 분석
동북아역사논총
2021 .03
-
제6차 교육과정기(1992~96) 중·고등학교 『국사』 교과서의 고려 시대 내용 분석
역사와교육
2022 .05
-
韓國的中國文學史編寫硏究
국제언어문학
2023 .12
-
지속가능한 발전을 위한 역사교육 - 환경사와 역사교육의 연대를 위한 제언
역사비평
2022 .02
-
조선의 冕服: 정치와 외교의 修辭
역사민속학
2022 .06
-
백제 초기 왕계에 대한 이해 - 고이왕과 근초고왕을 중심으로 -
백제학보
2022 .08
-
제1차 교육과정기 발행 『중등국사』 (역사교육연구회 엮음) 교과서의 특성과 의의
역사교육
2018 .06
-
한국 공공역사 연구의 가능성과 지향
역사비평
2024 .08
-
World history가 아닌 Global history
동서인문
2021 .04
-
안정복의 『대록지』 보론
韓國史學史學報
2021 .01
-
Mapping World History in Korea
The Asian review of world histories
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001420510