지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.8
- 수록면
- 169 - 173 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The primary aim that we study and research on the democracy is to say to improve the democracy of our community towards desirable directions.
In 1960, people’s desire and aspiration for a democracy in Korea finally brought about a dramatic political change, April Revolution, which overthrew the old regime(the government of Syngman Rhee). Nonetheless, the Democratic Party Government failed in building and solidifying stable democracy in our society. For that reason, it might be a government which plainly showed the possibility and limitation of democracy in contemporary Korean political history. It has suggested lots of things, even including that failure.
As of now, in retrospect, it is no exaggeration to say that the history of Korean politics in the past 55 years was a process for the development of democracy. It showed somehow discontinuous and even regressive path rather than steadily advancing, however, in macro perspective it has certainly progressed gradually.
As it were, the Second Republic can be regarded as the first government which put democratic competition and procedure into practice on the basis of a representative democratic principle. But the Second Republic was resulted in collapse on account of followings: the factional struggle for power in the political scope and the inability to policy implementation owing to it, as well as its immatureness filtering politically surged citizen’s urge.
At the present situation, our study on the previous governmental regime aims just not to simply describe historical facts. What we research on undesirable historical events and processes is to restructure the past in order to have an answer for questions facing us today, through analyzing past events focusing on the structure and behaviors.
This research aims to analyze why the democratic system of the Second Republic has been frustrated. At present, what we review the democracy of the Second Republic is to get present political implications, through investigating how Korean democracy went along with contents and directions at that time, what has been the result, and why it was frustrated.
In 1960, people’s desire and aspiration for a democracy in Korea finally brought about a dramatic political change, April Revolution, which overthrew the old regime(the government of Syngman Rhee). Nonetheless, the Democratic Party Government failed in building and solidifying stable democracy in our society. For that reason, it might be a government which plainly showed the possibility and limitation of democracy in contemporary Korean political history. It has suggested lots of things, even including that failure.
As of now, in retrospect, it is no exaggeration to say that the history of Korean politics in the past 55 years was a process for the development of democracy. It showed somehow discontinuous and even regressive path rather than steadily advancing, however, in macro perspective it has certainly progressed gradually.
As it were, the Second Republic can be regarded as the first government which put democratic competition and procedure into practice on the basis of a representative democratic principle. But the Second Republic was resulted in collapse on account of followings: the factional struggle for power in the political scope and the inability to policy implementation owing to it, as well as its immatureness filtering politically surged citizen’s urge.
At the present situation, our study on the previous governmental regime aims just not to simply describe historical facts. What we research on undesirable historical events and processes is to restructure the past in order to have an answer for questions facing us today, through analyzing past events focusing on the structure and behaviors.
This research aims to analyze why the democratic system of the Second Republic has been frustrated. At present, what we review the democracy of the Second Republic is to get present political implications, through investigating how Korean democracy went along with contents and directions at that time, what has been the result, and why it was frustrated.
목차
Ⅰ. 緖論
Ⅱ. 民主主義의 制約要因
Ⅲ. 國家, 政治社會의 能力不在
Ⅳ. 市民社會의 噴出과 軍部
Ⅴ. 結論
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
민주공화주의에 대한 헌법적 고찰
법학논총
2016 .02
-
‘민주공화정’의 표상과 공공 미덕 : 3·1운동 100돌 새김
사회이론
2019 .11
-
생존권을 통한 민주공화국원리의 실현 ― 기본소득을 중심으로 ―
공법연구
2018 .12
-
산업화·민주화 이후 길은 어디에 있나
주간경향
2025 .01
-
대한민국의 탄생과 공화주의 실현의 과제
국가법연구
2020 .01
-
고등학생의 민주시민성 영향요인: 민주적 학교 풍토를 중심으로
한국교육학연구
2022 .06
-
[김상회의 영화로 읽는 한국사회 | 잉글리쉬 페이션트❼] 자유 없는 민주사회
더스쿠프
2023 .03
-
경제민주화의 이론과 과제
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2017 .12
-
민주학교 운영 실태 분석을 통한 민주학교 실천 전략 연구(OR2021-01)
[KEDI] 연구보고서
2021 .12
-
청소년의 민주적 의사소통 능력 진단을 위한 수행과제 개발 및 타당화
교육과정평가연구
2023 .05
-
학교 민주시민교육의 현황 및 활성화 방안: 교육법적 관점에서
교육법학연구
2019 .01
-
민주학교에 대한 구성원들의 인식과 요구: 학교민주주의 구현을 위한 시사점
시민교육연구
2020 .01
-
민주시민교육의 새로운 방식 탐구:내러티브 접근
내러티브와 교육연구
2021 .08
-
민주시민교육에 대한 인식 연구
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2023 .05
-
동아시아 5개국 제헌 과정의 민주적 정당성 비교
한국정치연구
2021 .01
-
우리나라 민주시민교육의 현황과 법적 근거
일감법학
2023 .04
-
최근 콩고민주공화국 정치위기의 분석과 전망
주요국제문제분석
2017 .10
-
네트워크 텍스트 분석을 통한 국내 민주시민교육 연구 동향 분석
The SNU Journal of Education Research
2020 .01
-
한국의 민주화운동과 민주화
민주주의와 인권
2015 .12
-
한국의 민주시민교육: 사회적 합의의 방향과 제도화의 과제
시민과세계
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-910-001857438