지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper focuses on the three aspects not only in political changes of the Soviet Union and Japan but also in the change of international situation. First, since World War II, both governments did not have official exchanges for ten years. However, they tried to resume their foreign relation. This paper shows why they tried to improve and resume the foreign relation.
Second, they restored diplomatic relations through four negotiations, but the peace treaty was not signed due to discord of resolving the territorial dispute. Thus, I will examine why they did not find the compromise to resolve the territorial issue between them.
Third, the issue is related to East Asia security strategy. At that time, the normalization between the Soviet Union and Japan through resolution of territorial issue is a major problem to have a strong influence on the strategic interestand to expand the eopolitical influence of the U.S. in Northeast Asia. Thus, the influence of the U.S. will have been the critical factor in the conclusion of the peace treaty and in resolution of the territorial issue. So I will also analyze that there were the U.S. changes of stance on the territorial dispute and the U.S. exerted their influence in the process of Soviet-Japanese negotiation.
Finally, I will examine the implication in solving the territorial issue between the present Russian-Japanese governments which was given to them through the joint statement in 1956.
Second, they restored diplomatic relations through four negotiations, but the peace treaty was not signed due to discord of resolving the territorial dispute. Thus, I will examine why they did not find the compromise to resolve the territorial issue between them.
Third, the issue is related to East Asia security strategy. At that time, the normalization between the Soviet Union and Japan through resolution of territorial issue is a major problem to have a strong influence on the strategic interestand to expand the eopolitical influence of the U.S. in Northeast Asia. Thus, the influence of the U.S. will have been the critical factor in the conclusion of the peace treaty and in resolution of the territorial issue. So I will also analyze that there were the U.S. changes of stance on the territorial dispute and the U.S. exerted their influence in the process of Soviet-Japanese negotiation.
Finally, I will examine the implication in solving the territorial issue between the present Russian-Japanese governments which was given to them through the joint statement in 1956.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 소-일 협상의 배경
3. 1955~’56년 소-일 정상화 협상
4. 분쟁섬에 대한 미국의 입장변화와 압력
5. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001814500