메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제13집 제1호
발행연도
2011.3
수록면
157 - 185 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The prevention of money laundering has became one of the critical issues nowadays with regard to transparency and virtuous cycle of economy, the prevention of crime, and the expansion of national budget. Therefore, the regulation stretches over various legal areas rather than belong to a specific legal area. Money laundering means the process of disguising the illegal origin of funds in order to make them appear legitimate. The regulation is mainly supported by the Special Finance Report Act and the Crime Profit Act. The Special Finance Report Act is implemented by the Customer Due Diligence Regulation, the Suspicious Transaction Report Regulation, and the Currency Transaction Report Regulation, and these regulations consist of the core of the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation. Meanwhile, the Crime Profit Act provides a legal ground in forfeiting profits from illegal activities. Also, workers of financial institutions and financial institutions are obligated to report to the authorities when he/she gets to be suspicious of accounts as profits of illegal activities. Money laundering can be divided into following types as what kinds of methods are used; Casinos, normal transaction of international trade and wire transfer, transactions among financial institutions, and alternative wire transfers. To cope with these types, the Special Finance Transaction Report defines Casinos as a financial institution, and requires them to report to the authorities. However, transaction reporting collides with individual`s privacy. Hence, the Finance Information Analysis Institute gathered related data, and hand out the data to other authorities under strict conditions in an effort to harmonize public interests with individual`s privacy. Meanwhile, there can be controversy on the Crime Profit Act whether it violates property rights as the act prescribes that the authorities can forfeit a crime profit. Hence, strict and accurate standards which define a crime profit are necessary. Financial institutions should make an effort to follow the regulation by running an inner control system or compliance system to prevent money laundering, and the Financial Supervisory Service should inspect and supervise the financial institutions. Today, there are many similarities among the anti-money laundering regulation of major countries. It is because nations in FATF-GAFI follow Recommendation 40+9 in making their system. However, there is a little difference by nations, and we have better refer to the scope of who should report to the authorities in America and the Europe. Authorities` continuing interests and efforts are necessary because types of money laundering will be diversified in the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 대법원 1990. 3. 23. 선고 89누4789 판결

    원천징수하는 소득세에 있어서는 납세의무자의 신고나 과세관청의 부과결정이 없이 법령이 정하는 바에 따라 그 세액이 자동적으로 확정되고, 원천징수의무자는 소득세법 제142조 및 제143조의 규정에 의하여 이와 같이 자동적으로 확정되는 세액을 수급자로부터 징수하여 과세관청에 납부하여야 할 의무를 부담하고

    자세히 보기

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002579966