지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
To precisely define hearsay is extremely difficult. In general, We may sat that "hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at trial, offerd in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted". Another definition of hearsay might be a statement made out of court that is not made in the course of the trial in which it is offered and that is offered for the truth of the fact asserted in statement where there is no opportunity for cross examination and without testimony. Korean Criminal Procedure Act article 310-2 provides that Except as provided for Article 311 through 316, any document which contains a statement in the place of the statement made at a preparatory hearing or during public trial, or any statement the import of which is another person`s statement made outside preparatory hearing or at the time other than public trial date, shall not be admitted as evidence. The Korean Supreme court said that criminal investigation reports including the accused`s statement is the written statement, therefore that report should be obedient Article 313. The Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Collected Evidence is the part of Criminal Procedure Code that it does not admit as Evidence ability of the Illegally Collected Evidence. The Illegally Collected Evidence is constituent in ways of human rights infringement. This rule commands that where evidence has been obtained in violation of the privileges guaranteed by Korean Constitution and Criminal Procedure Act, the evidence must be excluded at the trial. Evidence which is obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure is excluded from evidence under the Criminal Procedure Law Article 308-2 The problem of harmony doesn`t solve the conflict between voluntary search and the idea of safeguarding human rights in criminal justice. This important problem is widely discussed. Fragmentary and superficial approachment is not problem solution of systematic, more synthesis and inclusive studies. In criminal procedure code, about evidence ability or recognize of illegally collected evidence, ask of true discovery doctrine and from this point of safeguarding human rights, what point of harmony to constitutional ideas in asking the movements of the due process In this case, The Korean Supreme court said that the seized article without the warrant for seizure and during the suspect`s absence is Evidence Illegally Obtained, therefore shall not be admitted as evidence, conclude that criminal investigation reports including the accused`s statement is the written statement, and written statements have been held inadmissible under the rule excluding hearsay evidence when the form is judical or relates to judicial matters.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (46)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (3)
-
대법원 2011. 9. 8. 선고 2009도7419 판결
자세히 보기 -
헌법재판소 1998. 9. 30. 선고 97헌바51 전원재판부〔합헌〕
직접주의와 전문법칙의 예외를 규정한 형사소송법 제314조는 그 내용에 있어 사망, 질병 또는 이에 준하는 부득이한 사유로 원진술자 또는 작성자가 진술을 할 수 없는 때에 한하여 그 필요성을 인정함으로써 직접주의 및 전문법칙의 예외를 인정할 사유로서 정당성을 가지고 있고, 필요성이 있는 경우에도 "특히 신빙할 수 있는 상태하에서 행하여진 때에
자세히 보기 -
대법원 2007. 11. 15. 선고 2007도3061 전원합의체 판결
[1] [다수의견] (가) 기본적 인권 보장을 위하여 압수수색에 관한 적법절차와 영장주의의 근간을 선언한 헌법과 이를 이어받아 실체적 진실 규명과 개인의 권리보호 이념을 조화롭게 실현할 수 있도록 압수수색절차에 관한 구체적 기준을 마련하고 있는 형사소송법의 규범력은 확고히 유지되어야 한다. 그러므로 헌법과 형사소송법이 정한 절차에 따르지 아
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002573868