메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제13집 제4호
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
585 - 640 (56page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Just after midnight on 30 October 2010, the tenth Conference of Parties of Convention on Biological Diversity(CBD) adopted the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, while the actual negotiation for this Protocol had been performed by the ninth meeting of the Ad-hoc Open-ended Working Group on Access(ABS) and Benefit-sharing of the Convention on Biological Diversity(CBD). The objective of this Protocol is the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources, including by appropriate access to genetic resources and by appropriate transfer of relevant technologies, taking into account all rights over those resources and to technologies, and by appropriate funding, thereby contributing to the conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable use of its components. However, this Protocol concerns many thorny issues as follows: scope of application(including temporal issues); relationship with international agreements and instruments; modalities of sharing the benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources in a fair and equitable way; rules and procedures on accessing genetic resources; special considerations to emergency situations; recognition of traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources; functions of national focal points and competent national authorities; clearing-house mechanism; purview of the Parties regarding compliance with domestic legislation or regulatory requirements on access and benefit-sharing; monitoring the utilization of genetic resources; mandatory establishment of, scope of, functions of checkpoints; compliance with mutually agreed terms, etc. Despite the ABS Working Group`s failure to reach a successful compromise, the President of the tenth COP serving as minister, Ministry of Environment, Japan enabled the birth of Nagoya Protocol with its proposal to establish the Global Multilateral Benefit-Sharing Mechanism to which Japan pledged to contribute two billion dollars(USD). However, this Protocol is far from legal certainty, clarity, and transparency, because COP President deleted or neutralized so many outstanding issues. This is the reason why this Protocol is called "a masterpiece in creative ambiguity" which is supposed to fatten the lawyers` pockets.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002574007