지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The administration should be based on the Constitution and laws, and it needs to establish a system to protect people`s rights and interests against illegal or unfair administration. Particularly in the case of tax administration grounded on the violation of personal interests, it is badly in need of the protection of taxpayers` rights and interests. The taxpayer protection system has been operated on ex-post treatments, especially the system of national tax appeal. However, the system has not functioned for which it was set up due to various problems such as shortage of judges and investigators, insufficient professionalism, work congestion and delay caused by manpower shortage, insufficiency of quasi-judicial factors and otherwise. The followings show the problems in the system of national tax appeal and the solutions: First, it is advisable to so reorganize the Tax Tribunal that it may function as an extraordinary agency of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, i.e., a tax system maker and executor. Second, it needs a wide expansion of the tax tribunal, along with the supply of human resources, in order to solve the problems such as manpower shortage, work congestion and delay. In addition, there is a need to set up a system to secure experts at proper time. Third, the tax commission should be reformed to secure the fairness and objectivity of decisions. Moreover, tax judges` qualification, tenure, remuneration and identity should be made into a law, secondarily to the judiciary. In addition, a law should be enacted to call in experts such as professors, lawyers, tax accountants and certified public accountants at a reasonable remuneration. Furthermore, quasi-judicial factors should be more sufficiently reflected in the process of hearing and decision. Lastly, it needs to legally accept the re-audit system that is widely conducted for operational convenience, though it has not been based on the Framework Act on National Taxes, and by extension, to stipulate contestations concretely. The betterment of the national tax appeal-system is expected to solidify taxpayers` rights and interests.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 2010. 6. 25. 선고 2007두12514 전원합의체 판결
[다수의견] 이의신청 등에 대한 결정의 한 유형으로 실무상 행해지고 있는 재조사결정은 처분청으로 하여금 하나의 과세단위의 전부 또는 일부에 관하여 당해 결정에서 지적된 사항을 재조사하여 그 결과에 따라 과세표준과 세액을 경정하거나 당초 처분을 유지하는 등의 후속 처분을 하도록 하는 형식을 취하고 있다. 이에 따라 재조사결정을 통지받은 이의신
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002579264