메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정해권 (한국외국어대학교) 이영진 (한국외국어대학교/숭실대학교)
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제65집
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
297 - 316 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Adjective(stative verb), intransitive verb, and transitive verb in Korean are used as a predicate in a sentence, and each type of predicate class requires a specific case marker within its construction. However, the mapping of semantic role of each argument and case marker is not consistent with each other. In cognitive and typological perspectives, the different case alignments from Korean such in ergative languages are case-marked based on another construal of events. Therefore, the learners of Korean as a second language could make some errors with the case markers. To find the acquisition of each construction using Korean predicate classes, we conducted a selective blank task with 157 items for fifty learners. The results showed that 1) in adjective constructions, learners acquired the animate subject arguments easier than the inanimate, 2) in intransitive constructions, learners poorly learned both animate and inanimate subjects, 3) in transitive constructions, learners understood more accurately inanimate objects with accusative markers than animate subjects with nominative markers. For more effective teaching of Korean, it is suggested to make distinctions between the predicate classes and the animate/inanimate arguments in each construction in order to make the functions of each case marker more explicitly noticeable for the learners as utilized in the input enhancement methods.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002548418