메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제70집
발행연도
2014.9
수록면
213 - 236 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study analyses interactional metadiscourse used in both NS and NNS research articles (RA) to investigate how far advanced L2 writers can achieve the balance between both objectivity of argumentative writing and professional persona as a scholar within academic community. The findings suggest that NNS showed a higher degree of subjectivity and personality with an overuse of attitude markers, engagement markers, and self-mentions. A further analysis showed that the higher frequency of subjectivity, personality, and engagement features in ‘Results`` and ‘Discussion`` section (in particular conclusions) in NNS corpus may correspond to the inductive ways of developing organizational patterns in Korean discourse. These may be due to their lack of linguistic knowledge about the use of metadiscourse markers and socio-pragmatic failure transferred from their L1 traditions. Their strong preference for obligation modal verbs and rhetorical questions among engagement devices might be also problematic for Korean L2 writers. All above may contribute to an in-depth understanding of how the balance between subjectivity and objectivity can be achieved though interactional metadiscourse devices in the RA genre. Pedagogical L2 writing resources should be given to teach Korean learners alternative strategies for both genre-specific and culture-specific devices in written academic community.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002520436