메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제72집
발행연도
2015.3
수록면
171 - 194 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In a conjoined sentence with connective ending ‘-으러’, one can find a movement of place from antecedent clause, and the purpose of the movement from following clause. Therefore, a verbal constraint is formed that only strong action verb, excluding the verb that shows the movement of place can be used in antecedent clause, and only motion verb can be used in following clause. The subject for antecedent clause can be 1st, 2nd and 3rd person, and there also forms a subject constraint that verbs in antecedent and following clause must agree. For the mood of following cluase, all of the moods such as declarative, interrogative, imperative, optative, commissive and etc can be used. Although negative expression cannot be used in antecedent clause, it can be used as ‘안(ahn)`` negative, ‘못(mot)`` negative, and also ‘말다(mal da)`` negative in following clause. However, when used as rhetorical questions, it shows verbalㆍsemantic characteristics that are different from ‘-으러’ that shows the purpose premise of a movement of place. Most significant characteristic is that a combination with not only motion verb but also general verb is possible since constraints of verb in following clause disappears. Unlike the facts that ‘-으러’, which shows purpose of movement of place can combine with almost all interrogatives, and strong action verb excluding motion verb can combine as antecedent clause verb without any particular constraints, there is constraints such as only ‘what+objective postposition`` can be combined among interrogatives, and only ‘하다(ha da)`` can be used as antecedent clause verb and can be used as fixed forms of ‘뭐/무얼/뭘/뭣.’Also, due to these vanishments of verbal constraints, meaning of movement of place is lost and meaning of ‘purpose`` is denied by rhetorical questions, and therefore, the meaning does not signify the purpose of movement of place but denial or restriction of possibility or necessity in accordance to different tenses or persons. In this case, verbal, semantic changes are emphasized, can be used as sentense concluding in a form of omitting following clause, signifies negative through function of rhetorical questions, but it is unlikely to be admitted as a complete grammaticalization since used as following clause can be restored. But it is identified to be different with when ‘-으러’, a connective ending that signifies purpose of movement of place, is used at the sentence concluding by omitting following clause, because an action verb other than motion verb can be used as the verb for the restored following clause. And it also functions as sentence concluding in a form of ‘뭐 하러’ without following clause. In this case, unlike when it serves its semantic function as denying necessity, it signifies euphamistic refusal. Therefore, unlike that preceding utterance is allowed with all moods except declarative and exclamatory when it signifies denial of necessity and functions as affirmative, volitive, and prohibitive, when used as final ending, previous utterance must signify suggestive, optative, commissive meaning and etc. Above all, the fact that restoration of following clause is impossible when ‘뭐 하러’ functions as following sentence could be the most significant proof that it cannot be defined as a connective ending that signifies purpose of movement of place. ‘-으러’ that serves to deny necessity, or functions to signify refusal to a suggestion or a demand, seems to be undergoing changes of its verbalㆍsemantic function on a process of becoming final ending from connective endings that signifies purposes through grammaticalization. These usage of ‘-으러’ is very active in actual use of language and should not be overlooked.
#문법화 #수사의문문 #연결어미 #-으러 #connective ending #-eu reo #grammaticalization #the rhetorical question

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

어미 ‘-으려고’의 통사ㆍ의미적 특징에 대하여
목지선 어문학 2013 .12
련결어미 “-도록”과 “-게”의 비교연구
왕금하 중국조선어문 2015 .05
‘명사+(조사)+시키다’ 복합서술어의 유형 : 의미와 논항구조를 중심으로
김경열 어문론집 2015 .06
현대중국어 정도부사의 통사, 의미, 화용적 특징에 따른 분류연구
기유미 한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집 2016 .04
한국어 관계절의 의미해석 제약기제 연구
최혜령 우리말글 2016 .06

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002519375