지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Functional linguistics has explored the question of how communicative functions are reflected in the use of language. In this line of research, the present study attempts to characterize you know, which has been treated as a discourse marker, by investigating its communicative functions in conversation in terms of stance-taking and engagement from the perspectives of discoursepragmatic, interactional linguistics and systemic functional linguistics. This research starts with the assumption that conversation is basically a joint action between speaker and hearer in attaining equilibrium in sharing information about states or events being talked about. Based on this assumption, this study examines American English conversations, claiming that you know is a speaker-oriented stance marker which is closely related to the speaker’s attitudes in dealing with knowledge or information states of the objects or events being discussed. Second, this research shows that interactional functions of you know can be summarized as in the following: (i) seeking confirmation, (ii) getting attention, (iii) stalling for word search, (iv) indicating repair, and (v) providing additional information. In sum, this research shows that the functions of you know can be better characterized in interactional contexts in terms of stance-taking and engagement in the process of sharing information.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Context of the Research
3. Database, Methodology, and the Distribution of You Know in the Database
4. Positions of You Know in Conversation
5. Functions of You Know in Interaction: Information Flow, Stance-Taking, Engagement and Sharing Information
6. Summary and Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
Andersen, Gisle. 1998. The pragmatic marker like from a relevance-theoretic perspective. Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory, eds. by Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv, 147-170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Carlson, Lauri. 1984. ‘Well’ in dialogue games: A discourse analysis of the interjection ‘well’ in idealized conversation. (Pragmatics & beyond 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Clancy, Patricia, Sandra A. Thompson, Ryoko Suzuki, and Hongyin Tao. 1996. The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 355-387.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Carlson, Lauri. 1984. ‘Well’ in dialogue games: A discourse analysis of the interjection ‘well’ in idealized conversation. (Pragmatics & beyond 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Clancy, Patricia, Sandra A. Thompson, Ryoko Suzuki, and Hongyin Tao. 1996. The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 355-387.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국 영어 대면 대화에 나타난 담화표지어 well 연구
언어학
2016 .01
-
So as a Multifunctional Discourse Marker Used by Korean Speakers in English Conversation
언어과학연구
2015 .12
-
I think and I don’t know as Stance-Taking Markers among Korean Speakers of English
현대영어영문학
2024 .02
-
Stance and Grammatical Complexity in Conversation: An Unlikely Partnership Discovered through Corpus Analysis
Corpus Linguistics Research
2015 .01
-
Nice and Good as Evaluative Descriptors : An Exercise in Sequential Analysis
담화와인지
2015 .04
-
A Corpus-Based Analysis of Interactional Functions of Korean Inferential Evidential Marker, -n tus (ha)-
언어과학연구
2021 .06
-
영어 회화교재에 나타난 담화표지어 비교 연구: 한국 고등학교 교과서와 일반 회화교재를 중심으로
영미어문학
2015 .06
-
A Study of Interactional Functions of –kes kath- Using Corpus Analysis
언어학 연구
2021 .04
-
대학생의 학문적 영어쓰기에 나타난 견지 표현 양상 : 서법조동사와 견지 동사를 중심으로
언어
2019 .03
-
한국어 수업 대화에 나타나는 이야기의 기능 연구
언어와 문화
2017 .01
-
Investigating the features of L2 Pragmatic Competence in Conversation from Role-Play Interaction
영어학
2022 .01
-
Functional Spectrum of a Discourse Marker so in Korean EFL Teacher Talk
영어학
2019 .09
-
Stance-Taking and Sentence Types in Korean
언어와언어학
2024 .02
-
한․중 석사 학위 논문 초록에서의 입장 메타담화 대조 연구
한말연구
2024 .09
-
1881년 어윤중이 쓴 ｢담초(談草)｣의 특징과 대담에 나타난 한·중·일의 정세
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2018 .06
-
EFL 학습자의 일상대화 코퍼스에 나타난 담화표지 like
담화와인지
2021 .08
-
Stance Markers in Expert versus Novice English Academic Writing in Applied Linguistics
응용언어학
2020 .12
-
Stance Expressions in the Courtroom
영어학연구
2015 .01
-
치유 내러티브로서 공감적 대화에 관한 연구 - 『이슬람 정육점』, 『푸른 사자 와니니』와 연계하여 -
한국아동문학연구
2023 .11
-
인터뷰에서 나타난 수정 조직의 특성
영주어문
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
보조동사 의미의 인지언어학적 분석 : ‘버리다’, ‘치우다’, ‘내다’ 구성을 중심으로
홍달오
담화와인지
2015
.12
Cross-linguistic View on Pain Language between English and Korean
Youn-Jee Huh
담화와인지
2015
.12
A Corpus-Pragmatic Analysis of Wuli
Hye-Kyung Lee
담화와인지
2015
.12
The Meanings of ‘-uy’, the So-called Korean Genitive Case Marker and the Theme-Location Relation
Il Kon Kim
담화와인지
2015
.12
햇볕 정책, 그리고 개념적 은유
권익수
담화와인지
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-002661828