지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Brown and Levinson (1987) associate strategic honorific use with FTAs in relationship to(im)politenesslinguistic strategies. However, they do not address whether cultural values embedded within honorific devices function as another pragmatic negotiator in the perception of linguistic (im) politeness. Since cultural values are intrinsically built within both language and culture, they function as powerful social rules in social interaction. In Korean society, the `Confucian frame` can be acquired and developed throughout one`s lifetime through social practice, and is, therefore, shared cultural knowledge to be used as pragmatic tools in human interaction.
This culturally-learned frame thus becomes a system of behavioral rules, and affects the way a participant interacts and negotiates social meaning in situated contexts. Norms, individual frames, and the context of the interaction are anchored in feedback that is regulated by cultural script. Because the uses of honorific forms and cultural values are closely linked to semantic connotations, understanding the values embedded within Korean honorific forms requires an understanding of the underlying Confucian framework (the cultural script). In order to better understand the multi-functionality of politeness, researchers should analyze those meta-pragmatic functions existing far beyond linguistic dimensions.
The values that are embedded within Korean honorific usage are invisible, mental and meta-pragmatic. Perceptions reflected in meta-linguistic behavior thus require a cultural frame to precisely interpret linguistic (im) politeness, especially within interactional discourse contexts. Nonetheless, many previous studies have neglected to analyze meta-pragmatic aspects of cultural values embedded within functional linguistic strategies in discourse contexts.
The current study extends pre-existent politeness research in two important ways. First, it notes that cultural values embedded within honorifics play key roles in achieving the speaker`s pragmatic goals. Second, it observes that directness embedded within cultural values prevents it from being perceived as face threatening, since cultural values interacting with meta-pragmatic dimensions result in mitigating FTAs within interactional discourse contexts. A speaker`s perception of politeness is thereby effectively controlled by utilizing cultural values.
This culturally-learned frame thus becomes a system of behavioral rules, and affects the way a participant interacts and negotiates social meaning in situated contexts. Norms, individual frames, and the context of the interaction are anchored in feedback that is regulated by cultural script. Because the uses of honorific forms and cultural values are closely linked to semantic connotations, understanding the values embedded within Korean honorific forms requires an understanding of the underlying Confucian framework (the cultural script). In order to better understand the multi-functionality of politeness, researchers should analyze those meta-pragmatic functions existing far beyond linguistic dimensions.
The values that are embedded within Korean honorific usage are invisible, mental and meta-pragmatic. Perceptions reflected in meta-linguistic behavior thus require a cultural frame to precisely interpret linguistic (im) politeness, especially within interactional discourse contexts. Nonetheless, many previous studies have neglected to analyze meta-pragmatic aspects of cultural values embedded within functional linguistic strategies in discourse contexts.
The current study extends pre-existent politeness research in two important ways. First, it notes that cultural values embedded within honorifics play key roles in achieving the speaker`s pragmatic goals. Second, it observes that directness embedded within cultural values prevents it from being perceived as face threatening, since cultural values interacting with meta-pragmatic dimensions result in mitigating FTAs within interactional discourse contexts. A speaker`s perception of politeness is thereby effectively controlled by utilizing cultural values.
목차
1. Introduction
2. The Previous Politeness Studies
3. A Politeness Model Based on Cultural Values
4. Methodology
5. Data Analysis
6. Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (50)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - 김주식 / 2013 / 의미론의 본질 / 한국문화사
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Arundale, R. B. / 2006 / Face as Relational and Interactional: a Communication Framework for Research on Face, Face Work, and Politeness / Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2) : 193 ~ 216
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Barnlund, D. C. / 1985 / Intercultural Encounters: the Management of Compliments by Japanese and Americans / Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 16 (1) : 9 ~ 26
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Blum-Kulka, S. / 1987 / Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? / Journal of Pragmatics 11 (2) : 131 ~ 146
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Blum-Kulka, S. / 1990 / You Don't Touch Lettuce with Your Fingers: Parental Politeness in Family Discourse / Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2) : 259 ~ 288
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Arundale, R. B. / 2006 / Face as Relational and Interactional: a Communication Framework for Research on Face, Face Work, and Politeness / Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2) : 193 ~ 216
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Barnlund, D. C. / 1985 / Intercultural Encounters: the Management of Compliments by Japanese and Americans / Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 16 (1) : 9 ~ 26
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Blum-Kulka, S. / 1987 / Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? / Journal of Pragmatics 11 (2) : 131 ~ 146
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Blum-Kulka, S. / 1990 / You Don't Touch Lettuce with Your Fingers: Parental Politeness in Family Discourse / Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2) : 259 ~ 288
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Beyond Linguistic Politeness : A Frame-based Discourse Approach to Korean Politeness
언어과학연구
2015 .12
-
호주의 한국어 학습자의 경어법 이해에 대한 사회화용론적 접근
어학연구
2022 .12
-
韓國語 恭遜 話用敎育의 內容 構成에 대한 提言
어문연구(語文硏究)
2018 .01
-
漢語與韓國語禮貌語用策略對比硏究
중국어문학논집
2020 .02
-
정중 어법과 우리말 존대법 : 에스더기를 중심으로
성경원문연구
2015 .10
-
인터넷을 통한 의사소통에서의 언어적·비언어적 공손 전략 분석
담화와인지
2019 .05
-
한국인 대학생들의 한국어 이메일과 영어 이메일의 화용 실수 대조: 학기 말 성적 문의 이메일을 중심으로
언어과학
2019 .01
-
화용론의 위상 정립을 위한 몇 가지 문제 : 개념 정의 및 연구 대상을 중심으로
한글
2016 .09
-
의뢰기능의 경어표현에 대한 화용론적 고찰 적절성 조건을 중심으로
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
한국어 공손성 연구의 쟁점 -선행연구 분석을 중심으로-
언어와 문화
2017 .01
-
The effect of pragmatic cues on phoneme perception in real word recognition
음성음운형태론연구
2021 .08
-
한국어 공손성의 언어사회화 관습 연구
사회언어학
2016 .01
-
고급 한국어 학습자의 질문 전략을 통한 공손성 실현 양상 분석
이중언어학
2015 .01
-
한국어 문법 교육에서의 화용 정보 기술에 대한 고찰
이중언어학
2015 .01
-
Hong Kong EFL Learners' Politeness Strategy Use in Production and Perception of Requests and Refusals
영어평가
2021 .12
-
The Variable Use of a Pragmatic Marker, Please
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2017 .11
-
문화콘텐츠와 문화콘텐츠학 개념에 대한 메타 비평 : 문화연구와 문화콘텐츠학의 비교 고찰 견지에서
인문콘텐츠
2024 .12
-
영어 커뮤니케이션 능력 함양을 위한 화용론의이론과 실제: 한국 대학생을 중심으로
언어연구
2015 .01
-
공손성 번역의 적절성에 관한 연구 : 문장종결형에 나타난 공손성을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
2015 .05
-
요청 부담에 따른 공손표현의 화용적 효과 : 화자의 호감도 및 요청 수락 가능성에 미치는 영향
언어과학연구
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002339666