지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Jeon, Byeong-hoon saw that the civilization of ancient East Asia’s decorum and music and the democracy and republic of modern West could meet and create a new and harmonious political system. With a declaration that “a political system has its root on the ground,” he found a point where different cultural traditions and time periods intersect with each other. It connoted a central meaning that politics took care of the myriads of people and all creatures on the earth and that the principles and system of politics were derived from the people on the earth and followed the popular will, which required the taming of the earth. In addition, Jeon said that such political principles were a universal value of humanity, not a fruit of a specific culture, and that East Asia’s politics also started from these principles.
Jeon evaluates that Liao, Shun, and Yu Zhou-Gong all governed by the will of people and were the lawmakers of ethical civilization who established the ritual politics of republic and constitution. Liao and Shun’s spread of their reputation was the first case in which the ritual politics of democracy and republic was realized into a system in East Asia, and the tradition of ritual politics that respect the popular will was preserved well in the three generations. To demonstrate this, Jeon illustrated details examples from each field of politics, economy, society, and education. Especially, he deeply examined into the responsibility ruling system, land allocation system of friendship, integration of politics and education, promotion of school education, minimalism of punishment, and commission system.
In fact, this was a context of philosophical analytics to shed new light on the ritual politics and people-oriented idea of Confucianism from the viewpoint of ‘democracy’ and ‘republic’ rather than a discussion on history. Jeon praised that modern Western philosophers found the breakthrough of new philosophy from the reinterpretation of Greek philosophy, and asked that the innovation of philosophy was needed in East Asia. The future he ultimately pursued through such discussion was the world’s unified government of cosmopolitanism, where the ritual politics of East Asia and the governing by law of the West would share their strengths with each other and political democracy and economic equality would be realized.
Jeon evaluates that Liao, Shun, and Yu Zhou-Gong all governed by the will of people and were the lawmakers of ethical civilization who established the ritual politics of republic and constitution. Liao and Shun’s spread of their reputation was the first case in which the ritual politics of democracy and republic was realized into a system in East Asia, and the tradition of ritual politics that respect the popular will was preserved well in the three generations. To demonstrate this, Jeon illustrated details examples from each field of politics, economy, society, and education. Especially, he deeply examined into the responsibility ruling system, land allocation system of friendship, integration of politics and education, promotion of school education, minimalism of punishment, and commission system.
In fact, this was a context of philosophical analytics to shed new light on the ritual politics and people-oriented idea of Confucianism from the viewpoint of ‘democracy’ and ‘republic’ rather than a discussion on history. Jeon praised that modern Western philosophers found the breakthrough of new philosophy from the reinterpretation of Greek philosophy, and asked that the innovation of philosophy was needed in East Asia. The future he ultimately pursued through such discussion was the world’s unified government of cosmopolitanism, where the ritual politics of East Asia and the governing by law of the West would share their strengths with each other and political democracy and economic equality would be realized.
목차
서론
Ⅰ. 정치제도는 땅에 근본을 둔다
Ⅱ. 민의가 정치의 근본이다
Ⅲ. 민본과 민주의 보편성
Ⅳ. 요․순․삼대의 민주와 공화(1) : 정치원리
Ⅴ. 요․순․삼대의 민주와 공화(2): 제도와 운용
Ⅵ. 소결
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Current State of South Korea’s Democracy
JIAS
2016 .01
-
자유주의, 민주주의 그리고 자유민주주의
원광법학
2015 .01
-
Why Are South Korean Citizens Dissatisfied with Democracy?
비교민주주의연구
2019 .01
-
경제 영역에서의 민주주의에 관한 고찰
경제법연구
2021 .12
-
경제와 민주주의: 적인가, 친구인가?
제도와 경제
2017 .01
-
Social Conditions of Village Democracy in South Korea
Journal of Asian Sociology
2018 .03
-
The Effect of Industrial, Financial, Technological and Environmental Development Indicators on the Democracy Level in Emerging Economies
Journal of Economic Development
2022 .06
-
Judging Democracy in Canada
헌법재판연구
2021 .12
-
공화민주주의모델의 헌법적 가치구성의 의의와 한계점
한양법학
2017 .11
-
민주적 대의제의 실현
법학연구
2018 .01
-
For India, ‘Middle’ Democracy Works
Global Asia
2020 .03
-
대의민주주의를 넘어, 하이브리드 민주주의는 가능한가? -새로운 민주적 거버넌스 모델을 위한 시론-
공법연구
2020 .12
-
민주주의와 다문화주의의 관계에 관한 이론적 검토
법교육연구
2019 .01
-
민주주의의 의미와 본질에 대한 고찰: 대의민주주의와 참여민주주의-심의민주주의의 관계를 중심으로
헌법논총
2018 .01
-
Picking a Fight: Democracies, Liberal Constraints, and Selective Conflict Initiation
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
우리헌법상 방어적 민주주의의 독자적 인정가능성과 존재의의 - 일반적 법률유보조항과의 관계를 중심으로 -
공법연구
2020 .02
-
Deliberative Democracy의 한국적 수용과 시민의회 : 숙의, 심의, 토의라는 번역을 중심으로
현대정치연구
2018 .04
-
시민의 입법참여와 헌법 - 국민발안제 도입논의를 중심으로
외법논집
2018 .01
-
직접민주주의의 정치철학적 기반에 관한 연구 : 포퓰리즘인가 민주주의인가?
시민과세계
2018 .06
-
State of Democracy in Asia Report February 2017
EAI 스페셜 리포트
2018 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-910-000863896