지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.9
- 수록면
- 85 - 116 (32page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As information technology and services grow, so do the level of people's expectation of their privacy as well as the difficulty the Law Enforcement meet when finding evidence. To date, notable Supreme Court decisions regarding digital evidences were made on a few cases. With the revision of Criminal Procedure Act, the search and seizure of information is becoming a big issue in Korea as well. But the recent revision of the Criminal Procedure Act is lacking systematic integrity because it was framed upon makeshift provisions on the material objects and its physical locations without defining information itself. This study pointed out six disputes of the revised Criminal Procedure Act; limitations of remote search and seizure, confusion from other act defining execution process of information, lack of legal base to seize information to be used in pursuit of the suspect, lack of compulsory disposition measures to confiscation of information, and etc. The paper will form the concept of the information warrant and suggested the implementation model by reviewing legislations and precedents of the U.S., Japan, Germany and the European Council.
The implementation of information warrant is necessary because; 1) information is directly linked with privacy, thus its disposition procedure must be specific and strict, 2) inadequate legislation must be supplemented properly, 3) information processing should be systematically integrated with the Criminal Procedure Act as its core axes, and 4) anomalous warrant practice must be clarified and embraced into legitimacy.
Information warrant refers to a warrant system to process the data which was used and/or provided by act of crime, and includes such data that is to be used as evidence, to be confiscated and to be provided to pursue the suspect. The method of data processing in this warrant system should include those nine kinds; copying, duplication, deletion, access and etc.
Information warrant will regard the remote-search-and-seizure as a matter of controllability, rather than a matter of location. In addition, the paper reviewed and suggested resolutions for a few expectable disputes when the information warrant were introduced such problem; 1) integrity of legal system, 2) whether to include realtime trace-data in the object of the warrant, 3) access method for remote-search-and-seizure, 4) process of obtained data which is unrelated to crime, 5) deletion after copying as a mean of disposal, and 6) data encryption. Information warrant must be implemented because it will provide enforceability and legitimacy to the executing officer and the right to defend to the individuals.
There have been many studies on the search and seizure of information, but putting such approach as this study where putting concepts into one warrant system is unprecedented.
The writers expect future studies to follow regarding the legal concept of information deletion, permissible limit of search-and-seizure of foreign data, encryption as means of data disposal and suspension of user account.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
1. [보고서] - 국회 / 2010 / 디지털증거수집의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 공청회자료
2. [단행본] - 이상진 / 2010 / 디지털포렌식 개론 / 이룬 출판사
3. [단행본] - 강동욱 / 1996 / 컴퓨터 관련범죄의 수사에 있어서의 문제점에 대한 고찰, In 현대형사법론, 죽헌 박양빈 교수 화갑기념 논문집
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권양섭 / 2010 / 디지털 증거의 압수ㆍ수색에 관한 입법론적 연구 / 원광법학 26 (1) : 345 ~ 372
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형성 / 2006 / Computer Forensics의 법적 문제 연구 / 성균관법학 18 (3) : 97 ~ 126
2. [단행본] - 이상진 / 2010 / 디지털포렌식 개론 / 이룬 출판사
3. [단행본] - 강동욱 / 1996 / 컴퓨터 관련범죄의 수사에 있어서의 문제점에 대한 고찰, In 현대형사법론, 죽헌 박양빈 교수 화갑기념 논문집
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권양섭 / 2010 / 디지털 증거의 압수ㆍ수색에 관한 입법론적 연구 / 원광법학 26 (1) : 345 ~ 372
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김형성 / 2006 / Computer Forensics의 법적 문제 연구 / 성균관법학 18 (3) : 97 ~ 126
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001375035