메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

The Limitation and the Alternative of Fraser-Honneth's Debate
Recommendations
Search
Questions

프레이저-호네트 논쟁의 한계와 대안

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Sunghoon Moon (서울여자대학교)
Journal
Korean Society for Social Philosophy Korean Society for Social Philosophy No.32 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2016.10
Pages
219 - 258 (40page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
The Limitation and the Alternative of Fraser-Honneth's Debate
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
In this paper I try to point out the limitations of a monumental debate between Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser on the normative goals of progressive social movements and to suggest a alternative that can solve them. To this end, I will explain the whole outline of Fraser’s stance, distribution-recognition dualism by revealing it’s problems. And I will show an overview of Honneth’s distribution-recognition monism and his critique against the Fraser’s dualism by revealing it’s problems. Finally, I will clarify what is the alternative position to overcome the limitations of the Fraser-Honneth debate. Of course, the alternative position has a form of distribution-recognition monism, but it is different from Honneth’ stance because it assume the recognition as a relation, while Honneth assume the recognition as a action.

Contents

논문개요
들어가는 말
1. 프레이저의 분배-인정 이원론의 개요
2. 프레이저의 분배-인정 이원론의 한계
3. 호네트의 프레이저 비판의 한계
4. 프레이저-호네트 논쟁에 대한 대안
나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract

References (18)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-100-001619936