지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.91 No.5
- 발행연도
- 2016.11
- 수록면
- 233 - 238 (6page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has some technical problems. Our group has performed needlescopic grasper assisted SILC (nSILC) to overcome these problems. In this study, we introduce our technique and evaluate the safety and feasibility of this technique compared with the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).
Methods: The medical records of 485 patients who received nSILC and CLC were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical outcomes including operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain and perioperative complication were compared between the 2 techniques.
Results: Although wound complications were developed more frequently in nSILC group, there was no significant difference between groups in other surgical outcomes. In subgroup analysis, surgical outcomes of nSILC were similar with those of CLC not only in easy group but also in difficult group.
Conclusion: It seems that nSILC is safe and feasible not only in selected patients but also in difficult cases such as acute cholecystitis.
Methods: The medical records of 485 patients who received nSILC and CLC were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical outcomes including operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain and perioperative complication were compared between the 2 techniques.
Results: Although wound complications were developed more frequently in nSILC group, there was no significant difference between groups in other surgical outcomes. In subgroup analysis, surgical outcomes of nSILC were similar with those of CLC not only in easy group but also in difficult group.
Conclusion: It seems that nSILC is safe and feasible not only in selected patients but also in difficult cases such as acute cholecystitis.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A large-cohort comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a single center; 2080 cases
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2018 .11
-
Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .02
-
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with Mirizzi syndrome
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .02
-
Know-how of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Outcome of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2023 .11
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Early complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Comparison of Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy versus conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a single Center
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
Comparison of the outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .10
-
Advantages of Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy Compared to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Using a Propensity Score Matching
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using instrumental alignment in robotic single-site cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .06
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Comparision of Single incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
[Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgery] A Single Center’s Initial Experiences of Single-port Robotic Cholecystectomy and Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Surgical Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
The effect of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy on systemic oxidative stress : a prospective clinical trial
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .04
-
ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single- fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2025 .02
-
How to do single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using LEAN BACK Technique?
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2015 .09
-
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
4-channel single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is superior to 3-channel SILC
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-514-001565455