지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is concerned with speakers’ syntactic choice between the Verb-Object-Result (VOR) and the Verb-Result-Object (VRO) construction (e.g., push the door open and push open the door). This syntactic contrast is referred to as the resultative alternation. The main goal of this article is to investigate whether the resultative alternation is modulated by (at least some of) the putative factors that are known to influence postverbal argument alternations. I examined some of the effects, namely, pronominality, definiteness, type of modification, semantic abstractness and word length of object NPs, on the syntactic choice between VOR and VRO in naturally occurring resultative sentences found in the British National Corpus. The frequency of occurrences revealed that VOR is the more frequent and canonical construction, as has been assumed in the literature, while VRO is in general less common but highly frequent when occurring with some particular verbs and particular result phrases. The results also showed that definiteness, post-modified structure and extended length of object NPs tend to increase the likelihood of occurring in the VRO construction, although it is in general the less frequent or less favored than the VOR construction. This study demonstrates that the resultative alternation does not arbitrarily occur but is constrained by semantic and syntactic properties of the postverbal NPs.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Methodologies
3. An Overview of the Data
4. Analyses of the Data
5. Summary and Discussion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
러시아어 작문･번역 교육을 위한 러시아어-한국어 결과 구문 비교 연구
Foreign Languages Education
2016 .01
-
A Split Analysis of Korean Transitive Resultative Constructions
언어학 연구
2020 .01
-
Korean Resultative Construction Redux
언어연구
2022 .08
-
An Experimental Study of Resultative Constructions with X-key
언어학 연구
2018 .10
-
形容词的动态性与现代汉语VA动结式的能产性
중국언어연구
2024 .02
-
A Clausal Analysis of Resultative Constructions with X-key: Evidence from Corpus and Experiments
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
A Usage-based Analysis of L2 Production of English Resultative Constructions
어학연구
2019 .04
-
The Pseudo-resultative [V-ko (iss-)] Construction in Korean
어학연구
2018 .08
-
한국어 상 체계와 결과상의 유형 - 2차 상태의 내적 국면을 나타내는 비완망상 -
언어와 정보사회
2016 .11
-
영어의 결과구문 특성과 한국인의 이해도
영어교과교육
2016 .01
-
An Experimental Study of Yeo (2006, 2011): -Key/-Tolok Alternation of Resultative Constructions in Korean
언어정보
2016 .01
-
Judgement of Telicity in English Resultative Constructions by Korean Learners of English
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
Three Types of the Intransitive Resultative Construction in English: A Generative Account
영어학
2023 .01
-
A Corpus-based Cognitive Grammar Analysis of English Resultative Construction
새한영어영문학
2021 .08
-
Korean Speakers' Sensitivity to Aspectual Shift in Resultatives with Derived Accomplishments in English*
영어학연구
2016 .01
-
L2 영어 학습자의 결과구문 생성의 용법기반 분석(Usage-based Analysis): 한국인 예비대학생 작문 코퍼스 분석을 중심으로
Corpus Linguistics Research
2020 .01
-
On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
The Syntactic Status of Resultatives and the Direct Object Restriction
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
A New Type of Secondary Predicate Construction in English
영어학
2022 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-701-002125750