메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김규호 (영남대학교) 임강일 (울산대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제26권 제2호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2017.4
수록면
1,173 - 1,180 (8page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2017.04.26.2.1173

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analyze physical fitness and predict performance in types of field and track athletes to figure out elite and non-elite athletes. 102 athletes in field and track participated in this study voluntarily and the athletes were divided into 3 classes(high, middle and low)based on the national competition record and coaches’poll. All the tests, such as physical volume(height, girth of chest, waist circumstance, wrist circumstance, hip circumstance), body composition(body weight, %body fat, lean body mass, BMI, WHR), physical fitness(sit-up, curl-up, flexibility, grasping power, abdominal strength and VO2max) and also anaerobic variables(mean power, peak power and fatigue) were tested to each players. The result of each variables was expressed with percentile to evaluate physical fitness. And to predict performance level(high, mid or low class), logistic regression analysis was applied. The results were as follows: Based on the results from the 3 classes, there were significant differences in physical fitness. Among the 10 physical fitness, flexibility, VO2max, mean power and peak power in high class were statistically significant than those of mid and low classes. The factors that present the level of class among the physical fitness variables were flexibility and VO2max. The logistic regression model is shown as Y=-0.316 × (flexibility) - 0.230(VO2max) + 16.913. In addition, the anaerobic factors indicating performance level were mean power and peak power. The results indicate that it is necessary further research to provide more scientific evidence not only for recruiting athletes but also for training purposes.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
참고문헌

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-692-000826916