지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Across languages, polarity particles like yes and no alone can be used as responses to the polar (yes-no) questions. This paper offers a discourse-based account of issues concerning the distribution and interpretation of such particles in English and Korean. Arguing against syntax-based analyses, it argues that polarity particles are anaphoric in nature and their interpretation is determined by the antecedent evoked by the context. The paper also suggests that the parametric differences between the two different types of answering system, the polarity-based system (e.g., English) and the truth-based system (e.g., Korean), do not have to do with any syntactic structures of negation or NegP, but they have to do with the anaphoric nature of the particles. The stand-alone yes-no particles in English refer to the nucleus meaning of the proposition evoked from the question-under-discussion while the particles in Korean refer to the propositional meaning including the quantification information of negation.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Syntax-based Analyses
3. A Proposal
4. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] - Chaves, Rui / 2017 / A constructional account of small clauses / SUNY at Buffalo and Kyung Hee University
[단행본] - Claus, Berry / 2016 / Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system / Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Farkas, Donka F. / 2010 / On reacting to assertions and polar questions / Journal of Semantics 27 : 81 ~ 118
[단행본] - Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2000 / Interrogative investigations / CSLI Publications
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Hamblin, Charles / 1973 / Questions in Montague English / Foundations of Language 10 (1) : 41 ~ 53
[단행본] - Claus, Berry / 2016 / Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system / Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Farkas, Donka F. / 2010 / On reacting to assertions and polar questions / Journal of Semantics 27 : 81 ~ 118
[단행본] - Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2000 / Interrogative investigations / CSLI Publications
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Hamblin, Charles / 1973 / Questions in Montague English / Foundations of Language 10 (1) : 41 ~ 53
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Response Particles to Would You Mind Questions
담화와인지
2020 .02
-
Answering and Reacting with Yes and No to Complex Questions
생성문법연구
2022 .08
-
Anaphoricity and Accommodation: A Comparison of Too in English and -To in Korean
언어연구
2019 .01
-
A Semantic function of Korean Response Particles as Anaphors
언어
2019 .12
-
Ways of Replying to Negative Questions in English and Korean
영어학
2015 .09
-
Ambiguity of Response Particles to Negative Utterances in Korean and English
어학연구
2019 .12
-
영어권 한국어 학습자의 조사 오류에 대한 계량적 연구- 국립국어원 '한국어 학습자 말뭉치'를 대상으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
接続助詞として機能する「ところを」について
일어일문학연구
2016 .05
-
한국어교육을 위한 보조사 ‘만’의 의미와 기능 연구
Foreign Languages Education
2016 .01
-
초급 한국어 학습자의 조사 습득 및 발달 연구
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
助词“的”功能的同一性和差异性考察
중국어문논총
2019 .01
-
複合形式における格助詞性の希薄化について - 形式名詞と助詞が結合したタイプ複合助詞を中心に-
일본연구
2022 .03
-
Responding to Negative Utterances: An Ellipsis Account
영어영문학연구
2018 .01
-
아시아권 학습자의 지시대용어해결(Demonstrative Anaphoric Resolution) 코퍼스 기반 패턴 분석
언어과학
2019 .01
-
한국어 학습자의 조사 연속체 사용 연구 : 초급 학습자의 구어 발화 분석을 바탕으로
동악어문학
2019 .10
-
A Corpus-based Pragmatic Study of Anaphoric Pronouns in English and Korean
새한영어영문학
2016 .11
-
Q-movement in Korean
언어학
2020 .01
-
A Pragmatic Study of Referring Expressions in English and Korean News Articles
새한영어영문학
2016 .05
-
Focus and Presupposition of Korean Particle -lato
담화와인지
2023 .05
-
실제 중국어 대화의 말차례 끝 지점에서 연속으로 나타나는 어기조사의 기능
담화와인지
2022 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-701-001176120