지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第139輯
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 219 - 255 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2017.06.139.219
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examined the process how the Hongwu Emperor’s orders were delivered to Koryŏ. At the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, there were no regulations stipulating how to document and convey the orders of the emperor. In this situation, the will of the emperor was sometimes conveyed in the form of documents, sometimes in the form of oral messages, to the neighboring country, Koryŏ court.
The emperor’s orders were most commonly proclaimed in the form of an imperial edict, in the name of the Emperor. Most of the imperial edicts were drafted by the secretaries based on the orders of the emperor, but there was also a statement by Hongwu Emperor himself, called hand edict. In contrast to the former, the latter shows a much more direct expression of the emperor’s intentions. The words of the emperor were immediately transcribed by the imperial clerks. When the envoys of the Koryŏ heard the Emperor’s words, the transcript were conveyed by the envoys hands. When the Ming’s bureaucrats heard them, they were communicated to the Koryŏ government by sending an official document citing the emperor’s orders. The latter was one step further embellished than the former, so the emperor’s will was transmitted vividly. There was also a way of oral delivery of the emperor’s orders. It is a way for the envoys of Koryŏ or Ming to convey the Emperor’s words to Koryŏ court without being transferred by letter.
The route through which the emperor’s command is delivered can be summarized in five ways: 1) Oral message, 2) Transcript, 3) Official document, 4) Hand edict, 5) Imperial edict. Among them, the emperor’s will can be expressed most directly by 1) oral message. As the latter goes, the emperor’s remarks became more and more refined through more procedures, sometimes decorated with diplomatic rhetorics, and the emperor’s intention was gradually hiding behind the writings. On the other hand, 1) oral message had the possibility that the memory of the messenger was inaccurate, and that the envoy would arbitrarily distort it. The emperor’s words could be expressed more clearly and logically as it went by going through the various procedures.
The emperor’s orders were most commonly proclaimed in the form of an imperial edict, in the name of the Emperor. Most of the imperial edicts were drafted by the secretaries based on the orders of the emperor, but there was also a statement by Hongwu Emperor himself, called hand edict. In contrast to the former, the latter shows a much more direct expression of the emperor’s intentions. The words of the emperor were immediately transcribed by the imperial clerks. When the envoys of the Koryŏ heard the Emperor’s words, the transcript were conveyed by the envoys hands. When the Ming’s bureaucrats heard them, they were communicated to the Koryŏ government by sending an official document citing the emperor’s orders. The latter was one step further embellished than the former, so the emperor’s will was transmitted vividly. There was also a way of oral delivery of the emperor’s orders. It is a way for the envoys of Koryŏ or Ming to convey the Emperor’s words to Koryŏ court without being transferred by letter.
The route through which the emperor’s command is delivered can be summarized in five ways: 1) Oral message, 2) Transcript, 3) Official document, 4) Hand edict, 5) Imperial edict. Among them, the emperor’s will can be expressed most directly by 1) oral message. As the latter goes, the emperor’s remarks became more and more refined through more procedures, sometimes decorated with diplomatic rhetorics, and the emperor’s intention was gradually hiding behind the writings. On the other hand, 1) oral message had the possibility that the memory of the messenger was inaccurate, and that the envoy would arbitrarily distort it. The emperor’s words could be expressed more clearly and logically as it went by going through the various procedures.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 황제 명의의 문서 : 詔書, 특히 手詔
Ⅲ. 황제의 말을 옮겨 적은 형식 : 咨文과 宣諭聖旨
Ⅳ. 황제의 말을 구두로 전달하는 방식 : 口宣
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
藩屛과 監國: 明 홍무제가 구상한 통치 구조와 황태자의 역할
역사와 담론
2024 .10
-
원 제국의 유산을 이용한 홍무제의 외교정책: 고려, 안남과의 첫 通交 시도에 대한 비교를 중심으로
시민인문학
2024 .08
-
새로운 구두, 새로운 나
월간에세이
2019 .07
-
구두
수필미학
2015 .12
-
구두미에 들다 외 1편
시조시학
2024 .09
-
[당선작] 구두도 구두를
시조시학
2017 .03
-
아버지의 구두 외 4편
시조시학
2025 .03
-
홍무제의 고려인 妃 周氏와 명으로 파견된 周氏 고려인
중국사연구
2023 .06
-
명초 홍무제의 종교정책과 통치구상
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .04
-
[자선작] 구두
시조시학
2022 .12
-
노랑 구두
수필미학
2023 .03
-
승려 指空과 관련된 추가 자료와 그 해석을 위한 試論
역사와 세계
2023 .06
-
비잔틴의 구두
월간에세이
2019 .07
-
메시지의 기술
유레카
2019 .05
-
唐 陸贄의 制誥文에 대한 고찰
중어중문학
2018 .09
-
4-5세기 팔레스타인 지역의 그리스도교 성지 개발
장신논단
2019 .12
-
고려 무인정권기 명종의 현실인식과 정치운영
한국사연구
2015 .03
-
唐 玄宗 ‘開元 입법’의 맥락과 효과 ― 법전 格後勅의 형성 과정을 중심으로 ―
중국고중세사연구
2022 .08
-
[시] 구두 장인의 해맑은 웃음
자음과모음
2020 .09
-
[설교자를 위한 성지 가이드 XLIV] 성경과 성지, 요한복음과 성전(2)
성서마당
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-001194405