지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Considering the general ideas such as totalitarianism, and Su-ryong(the supreme leader) system theory, there is no need to purge somebody in the North Korea. In December 2013, however, so-called ‘the actual ruler’, Jang Song-taek was executed horribly as a signal flare of the purge on the high ranking persons under the leadership of Kim Jung Eun. It doesn"t make sense. If the power is overwhelmingly concentrated on the Supreme Leader, as described by the Su-ryong system theory, if all of the state apparatus are finely institutionalized to support his power, and if all of the ideologies legitimizing his authority such as Juche ideology are truly accepted by public and are prevalent in a society, and as described by totalitarianism, if all of the individuals and societies are under the surveillance of secret police, we can possibly assume that there are no different views, no challenges, and no purges. But if we look into the history of the North Korean regime, purges happened frequently. So we feel intuitively that we need different explanation about North Korean regime except the Suryong system or a totalitarianism, that is the perspective of the power struggle.
Under the awareness of the problems mentioned above, this article examines the four main purge cases of the North Korean regime: 1956, 1967, 1997 and 2013 purges throughout the history of this country, not to explain ‘how much is this Suryong powerful?’, but to explain ‘why are these purges still happening?’ under the article"s analytical framework, three backgrounds of power struggle: ‘an attempt to shift the power structure’ - ‘ideological debates’ – ‘economic policy confrontations’, and drew the conclusions as follows.
First, Although there is a question whether if there is a power struggle in the North Korean regime or not, we can assure that there is a power struggle, the politics in the North Korea. There are different views, conflicts, adjustments, and compromises among persons and groups. Second, the power struggles have been brought to the surface in the appearance of purges without exception in times of internal-external turmoils, and as the results of purges, the political power of the Supreme Leader have been maintained and solidified. Third, the power struggle took place for various reasons, not only because of a political factor such as a power structure shift, but also because of the ideological disputes or the economic policy confrontations, and all the reasons have their own consistent conflict structure and logic such as regarding the power structure shift, "collective leadership system vs. Suryong system which is a powerful dictatorship, regarding the ideological debate, ‘orthodox Marx-Leninism vs. Juche ideology’, and regarding economy policies, ‘communist economic policies vs. capitalist economic policies’. Fourth, something new pattern has been discovered in the recent Jang"s purge case, that Kim Jong-un, the new Suryong, favored and adopted some reformative economic policies such as ‘6.28 measures’ over against Jang Sung-taek"s conservative policies, which implicates that the North Korean regime might step into the Chinese style transition, embracing the market economy elements into the state economy through the reformative policies to secure the regime"s financial resources, and relieve discontents of North Korean people regarding economic matters, meanwhile strengthening the power in the political sphere.
Under the awareness of the problems mentioned above, this article examines the four main purge cases of the North Korean regime: 1956, 1967, 1997 and 2013 purges throughout the history of this country, not to explain ‘how much is this Suryong powerful?’, but to explain ‘why are these purges still happening?’ under the article"s analytical framework, three backgrounds of power struggle: ‘an attempt to shift the power structure’ - ‘ideological debates’ – ‘economic policy confrontations’, and drew the conclusions as follows.
First, Although there is a question whether if there is a power struggle in the North Korean regime or not, we can assure that there is a power struggle, the politics in the North Korea. There are different views, conflicts, adjustments, and compromises among persons and groups. Second, the power struggles have been brought to the surface in the appearance of purges without exception in times of internal-external turmoils, and as the results of purges, the political power of the Supreme Leader have been maintained and solidified. Third, the power struggle took place for various reasons, not only because of a political factor such as a power structure shift, but also because of the ideological disputes or the economic policy confrontations, and all the reasons have their own consistent conflict structure and logic such as regarding the power structure shift, "collective leadership system vs. Suryong system which is a powerful dictatorship, regarding the ideological debate, ‘orthodox Marx-Leninism vs. Juche ideology’, and regarding economy policies, ‘communist economic policies vs. capitalist economic policies’. Fourth, something new pattern has been discovered in the recent Jang"s purge case, that Kim Jong-un, the new Suryong, favored and adopted some reformative economic policies such as ‘6.28 measures’ over against Jang Sung-taek"s conservative policies, which implicates that the North Korean regime might step into the Chinese style transition, embracing the market economy elements into the state economy through the reformative policies to secure the regime"s financial resources, and relieve discontents of North Korean people regarding economic matters, meanwhile strengthening the power in the political sphere.
목차
1. 서론: 연구배경 및 선행연구 검토
2. 이론적 고찰
3. ’56년 8월종파사건
4. ’67년 갑산파 숙청
5. ’97년 황장엽 망명
6. ’13년 장성택 처형
7. 북한 권력투쟁 배경의 지속과 변화
8. 결론: 연구의 정책적 함의
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한 최고지도자의 권력 공고화 과정 연구―숙청을 중심으로―
대한정치학회보
2024 .02
-
북한 권력엘리트의 김정은 친화성 지수 개발 -장성택 숙청 이후 현지지도 수행 인원의 변화를 중심으로
통일과 평화
2017 .06
-
김정은 정권의 경제조치 실패요인 : 정책평가 이론의 종합적 접근을 통한 분석
북한학보
2022 .08
-
북한 권력승계의 주기(週期) 모델과 북한 체제의 작동원리
국제정치논총
2018 .06
-
권력투쟁의 미시적 작동원리에 대한 이론적 고찰
사회과학연구
2017 .07
-
김정은 정권의 권력 안정성: 안정 요인과 불안정 요인 분석
Journal of North Korea Studies
2015 .06
-
김정은 정권의 정치적 특성과 대내정책
Journal of North Korea Studies
2018 .01
-
북한 김일성･김정일･김정은의 ‘3대세습체제’에 대한 대북정책 변화 고찰
한국행정사학지
2022 .04
-
North Korean Political Dynamics of the Kim Jong-un Era
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2016 .01
-
Kim Jong Un Regime’s Social Control Policy: Continuities and Changes
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
김정은 시기 북한 경제정책의 변화경향성 연구 -텍스트마이닝 분석을 중심으로-
동북아경제연구
2020 .01
-
Determinants of Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Implications for Economic Reform in North Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2015 .09
-
북한의 무역과 산업정책의 연관성 분석
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2017 .11
-
The Change of North Korea's National Image - Analysis of the "Korea Today" -
Journal of North Korea Studies
2016 .06
-
김정은 정권의 신대외전략 분석
정치정보연구
2015 .06
-
An Assessment of the Past 10 Years of South Korea Policy of the Kim Jong-un Regime
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2021 .12
-
North Korean Political Thinking as a Reflection of Regime Survival Strategy
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2021 .12
-
북한의 치안정책에 관한 연구
한국경찰학회보
2020 .01
-
Determinants of FDI in Transition Economies and Implications for North Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2020 .11
-
Changes in the Structure of North Korea’s State Machinery in the Kim Jong Un Era and the Implications for North Korea’s Foreign Policy
IFANS FOCUS
2019 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-390-001240859