메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Myung-Sik Ju (Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) Hae-Kag Lee (Soonchunhyang University) Ham-Gyum Kim (Ansan University)
저널정보
한국자기학회 Journal of Magnetics Journal of Magnetics Vol.22 No.3
발행연도
2017.9
수록면
519 - 524 (6page)
DOI
10.4283/JMAG.2017.22.3.519

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Rotator cuff disease occurs in adults is very common cause of shoulder pain causes is known as one of the. Combined oblique coronal and oblique sagittal standard magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is highly accurate for detecting full-thickness rotator cuff tears. However, the accuracy of standard MR imaging is lower for partial- thickness tears. Small rotator cuff tears can be obscured by partial volume effect if the imaging planes are not orthogonal to the surface of the cuff. Angling the oblique sagittal images perpendicular to the lateral 2 or 3 cm of the supraspinatus tendon would reduce the partial volume effect, and might make tears in this region more conspicuous. The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy for diagnosing rotator cuff tears of oblique coronal images supplemented with standard oblique sagittal images versus thinner-section modified oblique sagittal fat suppressed fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. For full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, our study confirms that oblique coronal and standard oblique sagittal images are very accurate for diagnosing tears, and that supplementing oblique coronal images with thinner-section angled oblique sagittal images does not improve diagnostic accuracy for those few full-thickness tears that are missed on standard MR images. In conclusion, there was a slight improvement in accuracy for diagnosing rotator cuff tears, particularly partial-thickness tears, for the staff radiologist using the thinner-section angled oblique sagittal images.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Subjects and Method
3. Result
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-428-001276103