지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.9
- 수록면
- 97 - 147 (51page)
- DOI
- 10.46694/JSS.2017.09.32.3.97
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After a decade of post‐Soviet transformation in the 1990s, the Russian political regime established under Putin’s leadership in the 2000s had shown certain features of “electoral authoritarianism” (close to a “competitive” version), in which despite shortage of democratic essence, elections played a central role in Russian politics dominated by the Kremlin. Faced with a serious challenge by the mass political protests caused by massive electoral frauds in the December 2011 Duma elections, the Kremlin made a variety of efforts to suppress the protest movement and build a new formula of rule for maintaining and strengthening its power.
First, the Putin regime took strenuous endeavors to make its victories in the national and regional elections much more certain by making various legal rearrangements (e. g., the restoration of direct election of governors, lowering of the requirements for party registrations, and return to the mixed electoral system for the Duma with the 5% threshold rule) and by diversifying the methods of manipulating the elections (e. g., obstructing opposition candidates’ entering the elections, gerrymandering the electoral districts, providing illegal fund to the ruling party’s candidates, strengthening control over election monitors). In order to make these moves for electoral victories more successful, the Kremlin tried to weaken further the position of the opposition by increasing arrests of and legal charges on opposition figures, holding smearing campaigns against them, and using violence in certain cases. At the same time, it also made Russian society more submissive to the regime by introducing a series of repressive measures that restricted political and civil rights of citizens and tightened its control over Russian media and internet communication.
In the process of making a new formula of rule, a new political regime was being formed under Putin. It was getting close to a “hegemonic” type of “electoral authoritarianism” with the ruling power’s absolute domination in the national and regional elections. In those elections, real democracy was not there. Level of contestation between the Kremlin and the opposition was very low on the uneven electoral playing field, and certainty in the victory of the ruling party in the elections got extremely high.
First, the Putin regime took strenuous endeavors to make its victories in the national and regional elections much more certain by making various legal rearrangements (e. g., the restoration of direct election of governors, lowering of the requirements for party registrations, and return to the mixed electoral system for the Duma with the 5% threshold rule) and by diversifying the methods of manipulating the elections (e. g., obstructing opposition candidates’ entering the elections, gerrymandering the electoral districts, providing illegal fund to the ruling party’s candidates, strengthening control over election monitors). In order to make these moves for electoral victories more successful, the Kremlin tried to weaken further the position of the opposition by increasing arrests of and legal charges on opposition figures, holding smearing campaigns against them, and using violence in certain cases. At the same time, it also made Russian society more submissive to the regime by introducing a series of repressive measures that restricted political and civil rights of citizens and tightened its control over Russian media and internet communication.
In the process of making a new formula of rule, a new political regime was being formed under Putin. It was getting close to a “hegemonic” type of “electoral authoritarianism” with the ruling power’s absolute domination in the national and regional elections. In those elections, real democracy was not there. Level of contestation between the Kremlin and the opposition was very low on the uneven electoral playing field, and certainty in the victory of the ruling party in the elections got extremely high.
목차
I. Introduction
II. Overview of Electoral Authoritarianism as Regime Type
III. Rise of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia in the 2000s
IV. Putin’s Reset Policies since the Mass Protests
V. Consequences of Putin’s Reset: Toward Hegemonic Electoral Authoritarianism?
VI. Conclusion: Future Prospect of the Putin Regime
References Cited
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Political Discourse on Twitter: The Case of Election Fraud in South Korea
Korea Observer
2024 .03
-
The Illegality of Dis-election Campaign in view of the Public Official Election Act
인문사회과학연구
2018 .12
-
2018년 러시아 대통령 선거 평가: 푸틴의 압승 원인을 중심으로
슬라브硏究
2018 .01
-
왜 일본의 리버럴은 실패하는가? - ‘제2의 안보투쟁’과 시민-야당 연계 선거 공투 (2015-2021) -
일본연구
2022 .09
-
Forecasting the 21st Korean National Assembly Election from Post-Election Surveys: Lessons from the Failure and the Change of Electoral Landscape in Korea
Korea Observer
2020 .01
-
언론담화 선거기사의 비유적 표현의 은유 이론적 분석
어학연구
2016 .12
-
1949~1969 기민련(Christliche Demokratische Union)의 선거 캠페인 분석
사림
2017 .01
-
러시아 국가두마선거 결과의 패권정당제 적용과 성격: 유효정당수, 선거변동성, 비례성지수를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2024 .09
-
헌법상 선거관리위원회에 관한 연구 - 중립성 유지, 개선방안을 중심으로 -
인문사회과학연구
2022 .12
-
제헌국회의원 선거법의 선거권 연령 하향 요인과 북조선 선거법의 영향
역사문화연구
2023 .02
-
Analyzing Public Opinion and Emotions Using Tweets and Online-Comments toward Candidates in 2017 South Korean Presidential Election
Korea Observer
2019 .01
-
한국 제20대 총선의 신제도주의적 분석
한국민족문화
2017 .02
-
What Makes Swing Voters Participate in Protests? The Effects of Voting Patterns and Election Cycles on Participation in Candlelight Protests in South Korea
Korea Observer
2023 .06
-
선거보도에서 전쟁․전투 관련 언어사용이 유권자 인식에 미치는 영향: 2024년 한국 국회의원 선거보도를 중심으로
언어학연구
2024 .08
-
선거 방송 언어에 대한 일반인과 국어 전문가의 인식 양상
화법연구
2019 .01
-
1950-60년대 순천의 지역정치와 6·8부정선거 규탄운동
남도문화연구
2020 .01
-
1920~30년대 대구부협의회·부회 선거와 조선인 당선자
대구사학
2017 .01
-
Gender Stereotypes and Election Coverage in South Korea : An Exploratory Analysis in Presidential and Seoul Mayoral Elections
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2016 .12
-
민주화를 위한 과거와의 대화: 태국의 1973년과 2023년
동아연구
2024 .02
-
2016년 미국 대선과 민주주의의 역설
역사비평
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0