지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.11
- 수록면
- 293 - 335 (43page)
- DOI
- 10.15299/jk.2017.11.65.293
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Both Rawls" "equalitarian liberalism" and Sandel"s insistence on "minimizing disproportionate opportunity in capitalistic economy by consolidating fair procedures" presuppose more or less democratic liberalism which permits civil discussions and decisions. And theory of justice on the basis of civil society is also be found in Plato and Aristotle who present themselves at the dawn of Western philosophy.
Theory of justice of these Western philosophers, both modern and ancient, however, could hardly be applied to the present Korean Society which has remnants of feudalistic tradition, Japanese colonial domination, American military regime, despotism of Seongman Lee"s government and the so called "Revitalizing Reforms" of Jeonghee Park"s dictatorship successively. Predicaments of Korean society refer not only to the evils of capitalism, but to the feudalistic authoritarianism which let people submit blindly to the state authority, and the abuse of public power committed by the police, military, judiciary, and the administrative bureaucrats. Various kinds of violence, committed by state power, both covertly and overtly, have obstructed civil initiatives.
In order to surmount infringement of civil rights by the state power and consolidate infra-structure of civil initiatives and in Korea, inequality of arms" between the state and civil society, which let the state hold power over the citizens, has to be revised. A fair democratic society can only be achieved through clearing off feudal authoritarianism as well as bureaucratism of the state, a part of whose power rearranged and returned to the hands of citizens who could themselves supplement vacancy of state administration, and supervise potentially negative operation of state power.
Above all, authoritative conventions of the Judiciary resulting in arbitrary judgement, a legacy of colonial as well as dictatorial domination, have to be abrogated on the one hand, and "Citizens" Initiative for Legislation’ and "Call by Citizens", which let the citizens go in company with, and keep watch an eye on, the state power, have to be established on the other. "Citizens" Initiative for Legislation,’ is to protect legislation not to be deviated from original purport by private interest of assembly members or political parties. And "Call by People" is to let citizens, as a sovereign of state, inspect the abuse of state power.
Theory of justice of these Western philosophers, both modern and ancient, however, could hardly be applied to the present Korean Society which has remnants of feudalistic tradition, Japanese colonial domination, American military regime, despotism of Seongman Lee"s government and the so called "Revitalizing Reforms" of Jeonghee Park"s dictatorship successively. Predicaments of Korean society refer not only to the evils of capitalism, but to the feudalistic authoritarianism which let people submit blindly to the state authority, and the abuse of public power committed by the police, military, judiciary, and the administrative bureaucrats. Various kinds of violence, committed by state power, both covertly and overtly, have obstructed civil initiatives.
In order to surmount infringement of civil rights by the state power and consolidate infra-structure of civil initiatives and in Korea, inequality of arms" between the state and civil society, which let the state hold power over the citizens, has to be revised. A fair democratic society can only be achieved through clearing off feudal authoritarianism as well as bureaucratism of the state, a part of whose power rearranged and returned to the hands of citizens who could themselves supplement vacancy of state administration, and supervise potentially negative operation of state power.
Above all, authoritative conventions of the Judiciary resulting in arbitrary judgement, a legacy of colonial as well as dictatorial domination, have to be abrogated on the one hand, and "Citizens" Initiative for Legislation’ and "Call by Citizens", which let the citizens go in company with, and keep watch an eye on, the state power, have to be established on the other. "Citizens" Initiative for Legislation,’ is to protect legislation not to be deviated from original purport by private interest of assembly members or political parties. And "Call by People" is to let citizens, as a sovereign of state, inspect the abuse of state power.
목차
〈국문초록〉
1. 머리말
2. 롤스와 샌델의 정의론 담론
3. 고대 플라톤과 아리스토텔레스의 ‘몫’의 정의론(올바름 to dikaion, he dikaiosyne)
4. 해방 후 공권력에 의한 인권 침해의 역사
5. 식민지배 및 독재정권의 제도적 잔재와 정의사회 구현의 방안
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Democratization and the Role of Civil Society: Can S. Korea’s experience be replicated in today’s authoritarian country?
사회과학연구
2024 .04
-
시민사회의 이중성과 해방의 조건 - 헤겔 시민사회론과 새로운 규범성 모색
헤겔연구
2021 .01
-
중국의 민법전 제정에 대한 노력과 과제
한중관계연구
2015 .03
-
동서양 정치철학에서의 자유, 평등과 국가와의 관계성에 대한 고찰 - 아리스토텔레스, 공자, 마이클 샌델, 존 롤즈를 중심으로
인문학연구
2019 .06
-
A Human Security Perspective of South Korea's Civil Nuclear Power
Korea Observer
2017 .03
-
시민사회의 적, 극우 개신교의 레드-포비아 현상에 대한 비판적 일고
기독교사회윤리
2021 .01
-
日本と植民地朝鮮における性科学言説の展開とその相違に関する一考察
일본문화학보
2021 .11
-
M. 샌델 정의의 사례중심토론수업의 인성교육방안 연구
철학논총
2017 .10
-
시민사회, 무엇을 할 것인가? - 분배적 정의와 인정의 화해 -
철학연구
2022 .11
-
스피노자의 정치이론 ― 시민사회와 국가의 관계를 중심으로
도시인문학연구
2017 .01
-
시민의 귀환 - 90년대 시민 담론과 자유주의
인문학연구
2020 .12
-
시민행동지수를 통해서본 경기도 시민사회단체의 역량과 과제
신학과 사회
2016 .01
-
김형준의 근대 시민사회 비판과 ‘신세대론’
종교교육학연구
2022 .12
-
헤겔 실천철학에서 시민사회 분석과 공적 통제의 정당성 문제
헤겔연구
2016 .06
-
경기도의 시민사회, ‘87체제’의 대안인가? - CAI로 분석한 경기도의 시민사회 -
신학과 사회
2016 .01
-
역사소비시대, 대중역사에서 시민역사로
역사학보
2019 .03
-
롤즈의 정의론과 교육: 민주주의적 평등을 중심으로
윤리학
2020 .01
-
Civil Society and Refugee Support in Japan
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016 .04
-
롤스의 정의론이 생략한 인간의 탐욕과 사회적 갈등
철학∙사상∙문화
2020 .01
-
1950년대 중ㆍ후반기~1960년대 전반기, 역대 정부의 電力對策과 電源開發政策
사림
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001560242