메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ho-Young Yang (Seoul National University)
저널정보
한국서양고전학회 서양고전학연구 서양고전학연구 제56권 제3호
발행연도
2017.12
수록면
61 - 78 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to examine the characteristics of Cicero’s probabilism in his philosophical dialogues, especially in Academica. His philosophical dialogues express a moderate sceptical attitude which allows to endorse persuasive views on a provisional basis. He suggests that his inquiry would reveal the view which is ‘most likely to be true’. At first sight, when he makes a choice between available theories in many places of his philosophical dialogues, he seems to do it on an arbitrary basis without giving any reasons. However, although he does not explain this characteristic process of investigating persuasive views in any detail, I suggest that the discussions in Academica would show characteristic features of Cicero’s moderate sceptical approach to theoretical discussion. This method also has a close affinity with Carneades’ procedure to test persuasiveness of an impression. Thus the ready acceptability of any theory seems to be taken as an initial sign of its persuasiveness. Moreover, some persuasive views exert more convincing power on us than others, when they have gone through further tests of consistency. Even when one philosophical view is impeded by another conflicting view, the one is not removed entirely from investigation. Indeed, there is no way to confirm that any view is decisively false, because there is no way to tell the veracity between them. Thus, even an refuted view can re-enter the inquiry at any time. The only view which Cicero can present more or less certainly as unimpeded would be the case of akatalēpsia. In principle, this is also open to impediment by other views. However, the idea of an ‘unimpeded’ view does not refer to the final result of investigation. Therefore, by ‘following the unimpeded persuasive view’, Cicero must mean ‘follow what is persuasive as long as it is unimpeded’. This is a state of continuous investigation, not an outcome of the investigation.

목차

1. Carneades’ Practical Criterion (to pithanon)
2. ‘to pithanon’ as a Criterion of Cicero’s Theoretical Discussion
3. Characteristics of Cicero’s Probabilism
Conclusion
Bibliography
Abstract

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-800-001671188