메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이향 (동국대학교(경주)) 박동연 (동국대학교)
저널정보
한국지역사회생활과학회 한국지역사회생활과학회지 한국지역사회생활과학회지 제29권 제1호
발행연도
2018.2
수록면
97 - 110 (14page)
DOI
10.7856/kjcls.2018.29.1.97

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examined the component of the Health Belief Model(HBM) affecting housewives’ purchase intention of environment-friendly agricultural products(EFAP). Four hundred and sixty five mothers with elementary school children responded to an on-line structured questionnaire. The respondents’ purchase intention of EFAP was 3.77(range 1~5). The mean score of health concern was 2.17(range 1~3). The mean score of the perceived benefits was 3.68(range 1~5). ‘Good for health’ had the highest score(3.93) among the 7 perceived benefits. The mean score of the perceived barriers was 3.29(range 1~5). ‘High price’ had the highest score(4.15) among the 10 perceived barriers. The mean score of the perceived risk was 3.48(range 1~5). ‘Genetically modified products’ had the highest score(3.65) among the 8 perceived risks. Health concern showed significant differences(p<0.01) according to the mothers’ education and household income. Mothers with a low education level and less income showed more concern about health. The perceived barriers showed significant differences(p<0.05) according to the household income. Mothers with a higher income perceived less barriers to buying EFAP. The purchase intention of EFAP was affected significantly by all components of HBM, e.g., perceived benefits(p<0.001), perceived barriers(p<0.01), perceived risks(p<0.001), and health concerns(p<0.001). The components of HBM explained 22% of the purchase intention. Therefore, emphasis on the benefits and lowering the barriers to EFAP is needed to increase the consumption of EFAP.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰
Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
References

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-590-001827509