지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제109호
- 발행연도
- 2018.9
- 수록면
- 207 - 239 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.09.109.207
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Contents, nature, meaning and implications of a certain argument, suggested right after the Korean liberation from the Japanese oppression, and also in favor of “Goryeo” as the title for the new state on the Korean peninsula, are examined in this article. It essentially shows how the history of Goryeo was generally evaluated by people of the time. This article is also meant to serve as a review of a past effort, which tried to reevaluate a certain part in Korean history from a different perspective on the verge of opening a new chapter for the Korean race. Hopefully such review would be inspiring for us all, living on a peninsula that has been divided for over 70 years, and especially in the current climate which for quite some time exclusively fathomed only ‘Daehan’ or ‘Joseon’ as valid state titles. The attempts made in this article could also allow us to approach the issue of “state title selections” from two different angles, not only seeing them as part of a political agenda, but also viewing them as a new way in historical recognition.
The demand for a state title “Goryeo” had already been in the minds of the Korean people during the Japanese occupation period. Then it surfaced for the first time right after the liberation, and was more actively presented in 1947 by the Moderates in their response to the Joint U.S-U.S.S.R Committee. In 1948, the Korean Democratic Party also joined the cause during the Korean Constitution’s designing process. The argument itself was promoted based upon certain notions that 1) Goryeo was a dynasty which inherited the legacy of Goguryeo, that 2) Goryeo rose to prominence through fighting foreign factions with its own force, and that 3) Goryeo was a state which earned recognition of the outer world under the name “Korea.” This recognition of Goryeo history was inspired not only by Nationalistic historical scholars but Neo-Nationalistic Korean scholars as well. Yet at the same time it still lacked the perspective to view Goryeo as a unified state, or as a country that prospered on cultural developments as well as diplomacy with their neighbors.
This campaign for ‘Goryeo’ as the new state title was in fact an attempt to put a dent in a previous notion of the Daehan Min’guk Provisional government being the sole legitimate representative body of the Korean people. In other words, it was an effort to create a new identity for the Korean race. Yet rather than pursuing peaceful stability for the Korean people with the newly named state, the campaign was more interested in show-casing the history of Goryeo as a period which supposedly pursued developments through strength and force. Of course, even such an effort served -in its own way- the objective of peaceful unification on the Korean peninsula. To a certain extent it widened the people’s eyes, and helped them better appreciate both national and global merits this dynasty in the past did feature.
The demand for a state title “Goryeo” had already been in the minds of the Korean people during the Japanese occupation period. Then it surfaced for the first time right after the liberation, and was more actively presented in 1947 by the Moderates in their response to the Joint U.S-U.S.S.R Committee. In 1948, the Korean Democratic Party also joined the cause during the Korean Constitution’s designing process. The argument itself was promoted based upon certain notions that 1) Goryeo was a dynasty which inherited the legacy of Goguryeo, that 2) Goryeo rose to prominence through fighting foreign factions with its own force, and that 3) Goryeo was a state which earned recognition of the outer world under the name “Korea.” This recognition of Goryeo history was inspired not only by Nationalistic historical scholars but Neo-Nationalistic Korean scholars as well. Yet at the same time it still lacked the perspective to view Goryeo as a unified state, or as a country that prospered on cultural developments as well as diplomacy with their neighbors.
This campaign for ‘Goryeo’ as the new state title was in fact an attempt to put a dent in a previous notion of the Daehan Min’guk Provisional government being the sole legitimate representative body of the Korean people. In other words, it was an effort to create a new identity for the Korean race. Yet rather than pursuing peaceful stability for the Korean people with the newly named state, the campaign was more interested in show-casing the history of Goryeo as a period which supposedly pursued developments through strength and force. Of course, even such an effort served -in its own way- the objective of peaceful unification on the Korean peninsula. To a certain extent it widened the people’s eyes, and helped them better appreciate both national and global merits this dynasty in the past did feature.
#중간파
#한국민주당
#대한민국임시정부 정통론
#고구려 계승의식
#민족주의사학
#신민족주의사학
#Moderates, Korean Democratic Party
#The Notion of Daehan Min'guk Provisional government being the sole legitimate representative body of the Korean people that prevailed during the Japanese occupation period
#the sense of inheriting the legacy of Goguryeo
#Nationalistic History
#Neo-Nationalistic History
목차
머리말
1. 국호 논의의 대두와 고려 국호론의 전개
2. 고려 국호론의 고려 표상 : 민족성과 세계성
3. 고려 국호론의 의의와 영향
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고구려인가 기자조선인가: 몽골제국에서 고려 역사상의 경합
역사와현실
2022 .09
-
13~14세기 고려 지식인의 시대 인식과 정체성
역사와현실
2020 .03
-
주몽고려, 궁예고려, 왕건고려, 코리아의 단절과 계승
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
고려는 어쩌다가 고구려를 계승한 나라로 인식됐을까
역사와현실
2021 .09
-
Personal Trajectories and National History: Why the Goryeo People Went to the Mongol Empire and How They Lived There
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2024 .12
-
교과서의 고려시대 대외관계사 쟁점 연구
역사교육
2017 .09
-
『고려사』에 인용된 原典의 句節
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
가사 不傳 고려가요의 생성연대와 수용양상
우리어문연구
2022 .09
-
고려중기 고구려계승의식의 변화와 ‘句高麗’
역사와실학
2020 .08
-
고려 충선왕의 직물생산 전략 연구
한국사연구
2018 .03
-
Perception of Goryeo Celadon in the Context of the Late Joseon Period
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2021 .06
-
고려를 찾은 동아시아 고승
동양고전연구
2020 .01
-
Remembering Goryeo, a Dynasty that was Open to the Sea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
고려전기 영토분쟁과 보주 확보에 관한 외교사적 고찰
인문사회과학연구
2024 .05
-
고등학교 『한국사』 교과서에서 고려 대외 관계사 서술의 문제점과 그 대안
역사와교육
2018 .01
-
1922~1937년 고려인들의 근대 경험— 언론과 한글서적 발간을 중심으로 —
사림
2023 .01
-
중학교 역사교육과정과 교과서의 단원 구성을 통해 본 고려 역사상의 변화
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
고려시대 자기인식의 형성과 문명의식(文明意識)의 변화
동양학
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0