지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to explain various meanings of the ‘-ko issta’ construction based on the generative mechanism of GL (Pustejovsky 1995), type coercion and co-composition. Considering the most outstanding meaning of the ‘-ko issta’ construction is the continuation of process, the basic meaning of the aspectual auxiliary predicate ‘-ko issta’ is the continuation of process.
The event structure of the aspectual auxiliary predicate ‘-ko issta’ has the event structure with the default process event and the main process event because the ‘-ko issta’ construction expresses the stage-level predication. The argument structure has one individual argument and one event argument since the aspectual auxiliary predicate ‘-ko issta’ is an event function. In its qualia structure, the Agentive role is ‘event_process_occur’ predicate and the Formal role is ‘event_process_continue.’ ‘Event_process_continue’ is realized as the final state of the event, the continuation of process.
The basic meaning of the ‘-ko issta’ construction can be derived by the function application of the event argument which expresses the process, the accomplishment or the reflexive headless event with the right head. Also, if the ‘-ko issta’ construction takes the degree achievement as its event argument, it means the continuation of the process. The ‘-ko issta’ construction with the degree achievement should be interpreted as the process meaning. So the event argument has to be changed to the right-headed event by type shifting operation (Rothstein 2004), a kind of type-coercion. The motivation of this type shifting is that the degree achievement consists of the partially overlapped subevents with the close relation between them.
If the event argument is the ordered achievement with plural subject, quantifier or frequency adverbial, the meaning of the ‘-ko issta’ construction should be the repetition of the whole event. In this case, the event argument must be the homogeneously simple event as the whole event by the other kind of type-coercion.
If the event argument belongs to the simultaneous achievement or the reflexive headless event with the left head, the ‘-ko issta’ construction means the continuation of resultant state. It implies that the aspectual auxiliary predicate ‘-ko issta’ has polysemy. So the co-composition of GL can be applied to these cases motivated by the reflexivity of the event argument and the formal role is ‘event_resultant state_continue’ in the semantic structure of the ‘-ko issta’ construction.
The event structure of the aspectual auxiliary predicate ‘-ko issta’ has the event structure with the default process event and the main process event because the ‘-ko issta’ construction expresses the stage-level predication. The argument structure has one individual argument and one event argument since the aspectual auxiliary predicate ‘-ko issta’ is an event function. In its qualia structure, the Agentive role is ‘event_process_occur’ predicate and the Formal role is ‘event_process_continue.’ ‘Event_process_continue’ is realized as the final state of the event, the continuation of process.
The basic meaning of the ‘-ko issta’ construction can be derived by the function application of the event argument which expresses the process, the accomplishment or the reflexive headless event with the right head. Also, if the ‘-ko issta’ construction takes the degree achievement as its event argument, it means the continuation of the process. The ‘-ko issta’ construction with the degree achievement should be interpreted as the process meaning. So the event argument has to be changed to the right-headed event by type shifting operation (Rothstein 2004), a kind of type-coercion. The motivation of this type shifting is that the degree achievement consists of the partially overlapped subevents with the close relation between them.
If the event argument is the ordered achievement with plural subject, quantifier or frequency adverbial, the meaning of the ‘-ko issta’ construction should be the repetition of the whole event. In this case, the event argument must be the homogeneously simple event as the whole event by the other kind of type-coercion.
If the event argument belongs to the simultaneous achievement or the reflexive headless event with the left head, the ‘-ko issta’ construction means the continuation of resultant state. It implies that the aspectual auxiliary predicate ‘-ko issta’ has polysemy. So the co-composition of GL can be applied to these cases motivated by the reflexivity of the event argument and the formal role is ‘event_resultant state_continue’ in the semantic structure of the ‘-ko issta’ construction.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘-고 있다’ 구문의 다양한 의미와 결합 양상
3. ‘-고 있다’의 의미 구조
4. ‘-고 있다’ 구문의 의미 합성
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 고석주 / 2007 / ‘있다’의 의미에 대한 연구 - 어휘개념구조 표상을 중심으로 - / 한말연구 (20) : 1 ~ 25
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 권재일 / 1986 / 의존동사의 문법적 성격 / 한글 194 : 97 ~ 120
[단행본] - 김성화 / 1992 / 국어의 상 연구 / 한신문화사
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김윤신 / 2004 / 한국어 동사의 사건구조와 사건함수 '-고 있다'의 기능 / 형태론 6 (1) : 43 ~ 65
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김윤신 / 2006 / 한국어 동사의 사건 구조와 어휘상 / 한국어학 30 : 31 ~ 62
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 권재일 / 1986 / 의존동사의 문법적 성격 / 한글 194 : 97 ~ 120
[단행본] - 김성화 / 1992 / 국어의 상 연구 / 한신문화사
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김윤신 / 2004 / 한국어 동사의 사건구조와 사건함수 '-고 있다'의 기능 / 형태론 6 (1) : 43 ~ 65
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김윤신 / 2006 / 한국어 동사의 사건 구조와 어휘상 / 한국어학 30 : 31 ~ 62
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상 보조 용언 ‘-어 있다’의 의미
언어
2018 .09
-
존재구문 ‘-어 있다’와 연쇄동사
언어
2023 .03
-
‘-고 있다‘ 결과 구문의 도출
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
‘-을 수 있다’ 양태구문의 통사구조와 부정극어 인허
생성문법연구
2022 .02
-
사건구조 관점에서 본 ‘NPL+V着+NP’ 존재구문 고찰
중국어문학논집
2015 .02
-
중국인 학습자의 ‘-어 있다’ 습득 양상 연구
겨레어문학
2015 .01
-
억양과 의미 합성의 상관관계: 한국어 연결어미 “-고”를 중심으로
언어과학연구
2022 .12
-
한국어 연결어미 “-고”의 무표성: “문 닫고 나가”를 중심으로
언어학
2022 .03
-
補助形容詞 ‘-고 싶-’ 구성의 統辭的, 意味的 特性
어문연구(語文硏究)
2020 .01
-
고정희 시의 외경적 유토피아 의식
현대문학이론연구
2022 .12
-
접속부사 ‘그리고’와 접속어미 ‘-고’의 의미 비교 연구
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
‘-고’ 어미를 매개로 실현된 제주 방언의 내포 구문
한글
2021 .03
-
‘설득하다’의 구문과 의미
언어와 정보
2024 .08
-
인지 처리의 특성을 고려한 한국어 통사 구조 분석법의 모색
언어와언어학
2015 .01
-
논항 도치 ‘V-R’ 구문의 인지 모델 연구
중국어문학논집
2024 .08
-
‘-고 싶-’ 구문의 성격에 대한 재고
어문학
2021 .03
-
Event-Based Language Typology through the Contrastive Analysis of English and Korean
현대문법연구
2016 .01
-
중국어 결과보어 구문과 한국어 번역문 사건 구조에 대한 인지적 분석
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
용언의 상적 특성과 ‘-었-’의 결합에 대한 연구
영주어문
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-710-000331593