지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The schism of the united Kingdom right after Solomon’s death set Israel along a totally different historical path. Jeroboam could establish national institutions for the northern Kingdom of Israel on the model of the southern Kingdom of Judah, but to choose a new capital was the most urgent task for him. Jeroboam moved the capital from Shechem to Penuel and again to Tirzah during his reign. Omri, unlike former kings, also transferred the capital to Samaria, which did not exist until its being established by Israel. Events of this nature had been very unusual in the history of Israel. Although the transfer of capitals in the northern Kingdom is very important, few studies have been performed, and their conclusions about these transfers have not been useful.
Especially regarding the transfer of the capital to Tirzah and Penuel, historians have considered these movements to be strange and unsuitable. To choose a capital reflects a national policy and vision. This study tries to explain the capitals of the northern Kingdom with a geographical approach for the purpose of understanding the reasons and background for their transfer. As a result of this study, now we can state confidently that those movements were not strange but suitable transfers that Jeroboam made to concentrate on eastern-oriented cities in order to control the Transjordan land and to integrate its tribes.
Omri turned his eyes toward the coast and the sea. He chose Samaria as a base to cooperate with Phoenicia which had monopolized the coastal trade in the Mediterranean. Samaria was located inland not far from the coast and was the best place for Omri to develop his foreign policy and strategy. He accomplished prosperity and fame for the northern Kingdom of Israel after Solomon. Jeroboam and Omri founded a national base and succeeded in making the state rich and powerful. They, however, were denigrated as vicious kings because of their leading Israel to betray God and to bring the religion of Israel to a form of syncretism. Therefore, their dream and policy for a new nation reflected in the transfer of the capital was subsequently forgotten or devalued.
Especially regarding the transfer of the capital to Tirzah and Penuel, historians have considered these movements to be strange and unsuitable. To choose a capital reflects a national policy and vision. This study tries to explain the capitals of the northern Kingdom with a geographical approach for the purpose of understanding the reasons and background for their transfer. As a result of this study, now we can state confidently that those movements were not strange but suitable transfers that Jeroboam made to concentrate on eastern-oriented cities in order to control the Transjordan land and to integrate its tribes.
Omri turned his eyes toward the coast and the sea. He chose Samaria as a base to cooperate with Phoenicia which had monopolized the coastal trade in the Mediterranean. Samaria was located inland not far from the coast and was the best place for Omri to develop his foreign policy and strategy. He accomplished prosperity and fame for the northern Kingdom of Israel after Solomon. Jeroboam and Omri founded a national base and succeeded in making the state rich and powerful. They, however, were denigrated as vicious kings because of their leading Israel to betray God and to bring the religion of Israel to a form of syncretism. Therefore, their dream and policy for a new nation reflected in the transfer of the capital was subsequently forgotten or devalued.
목차
1. 서언
2. 문제 제기 및 방법론
3. 사마리아 지역 개관
4. 북왕국의 수도들
5. 북왕국의 역사와 수도들
6. 결론
7. 참고문헌
참고문헌 (47)
참고문헌 신청
강승일 / 2009 / The Solomonic Temple as Sacred Space / Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 15(4):126~143
A. H. J. 군네벡 / 1982 / 이스라엘 역사 / 한국신학연구소
J. 맥스웰 밀러 / 2009 / 고대 이스라엘 역사 / 크리스찬다이제스트사
에드윈 딜레 / 1994 / 히브리 왕들의 연대기 / 기독교문서선교회
앤손 레이니 / 2012 / 포이에마 성서지도:Carta's New Century Handbook and Atlas of the Bible / 포이에마 출판사
A. H. J. 군네벡 / 1982 / 이스라엘 역사 / 한국신학연구소
J. 맥스웰 밀러 / 2009 / 고대 이스라엘 역사 / 크리스찬다이제스트사
에드윈 딜레 / 1994 / 히브리 왕들의 연대기 / 기독교문서선교회
앤손 레이니 / 2012 / 포이에마 성서지도:Carta's New Century Handbook and Atlas of the Bible / 포이에마 출판사
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
신명기 사가의 평가(왕하 17: 24-41)와 복음서 전승을 통해 조명한 사마리아 비차별적 포용 전통의 맥을 찾아서
구약논단
2025 .03
-
Did Jeroboam Participate in the Shechem Assembly? : The Portrait of Jeroboam in Three Different Traditions (1 Kgs 11:26-12:24; 3 Kgdms 11:26-12:24; 12:24a-z)
성경원문연구
2015 .04
-
한국 근대역사학의 발해사 인식 : 南北國論을 중심으로
한국사연구
2017 .12
-
여로보암의 북이스라엘식 종교개혁과 모세계 제사장들과의 신상 숭배의 상관성
구약논단
2022 .09
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 여로보암 2세 - 왕하 14:23-29 -
신학과 목회
2025 .01
-
고등학교 한국사 교과서의 ‘북벌론’ 서사 분석
역사교육논집
2024 .06
-
Korean Studies in the United Kingdom: History and Prospects
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2024 .12
-
전형적인 장면으로서 해석된 사마리아 여인의 이야기(요 4:1-42)에 나타난 익명성의 의미
신약논단
2017 .06
-
Revisiting the Historical Narrative in 1 Kings 13
구약논집
2024 .03
-
루터의 두 왕국론과 근대 주권국가에 대한 고찰
기독교사회윤리
2017 .01
-
열왕기상 16-22장에 암시된 “오므리의 율례와 아합 집의 예법” 연구
신학과 사회
2023 .05
-
북이스라엘에서의 요시야의 개혁 (왕하 23:15-20)
선교와 신학
2017 .06
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 예후 -왕하 9:1-10:36-
신학과 목회
2019 .11
-
동물의 왕국 1 외 2편
황해문화
2015 .09
-
사마리아 여인과의 대화에 나타난예수님의 선교 지향적인 상담에 관한 연구(요한복음 4장 3-42절을 중심으로)
ACTS 신학저널
2024 .07
-
내적 억압의 왕국을 무너뜨리라!
한국여성신학
2015 .02
-
사도행전의 주제와 구조에 관한 고찰 - ‘하나님의 나라’와 ‘주’ 기독론을 중심으로 -
신약연구
2015 .09
-
6세기 중･후반 북조의 책봉과 삼국의 대응
사림
2024 .04
-
軍記物語における熊野?現の?相 ― ?一本『平家物語』ㆍ『源平盛衰記』を中心に ―
일어일문학연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-023-000584116