지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.2
- 수록면
- 215 - 232 (18page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2019.02.30.1.215
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper grasped the author’s concept while opening up the history of British copyright law. In the UK, the rights of printing and publishing have evolved from the guild monopoly status of the printing and book publishers to the proprietary rights of that business and author. It was John Locke’s idea to sustain the development. Although Edward’s Romanistic ideas occur in England, they do not have their roots in England. Also, Count Mansfield’s Romanist ideas were not handed down to backward judges. In the end, it can be said that British copyright law has grown, excluding Romanistic ideas, encompassing aspects of the business owner’s property rights and the ideological impact of labor value theory.
In the first part of this paper, we recount the events leading to the making of the Copyright Act. In the second part, we examine the various features of this Act in the light of contemporary law and economic knowledge to show how they had the combined effect of limiting the monopolistic effect of a copyright.
The pressure on harmony in the 20th century eventually forced us to accept systematic contradictions under the British Copyright Act. In other words, copyright as incompatible property rights, and Romanistic copyrights, have become institutionally mixed, and the British Copyright Act does not originally have an institutional framework to cover both rights.
There is also emphasis on the factors of labor, technology, or judgment, as mentioned in the preliminary paragraph, as well as the requirements for creativity In response, this requirement for data base works introduced under the EU Directive is an element of intellectual creativity. Discussions about the nature of authors also affect the theory of requirements for creativity. I think it is quite interesting to see whether the British Copyright Act will maintain duality regarding the requirements of creativity, or go in the direction of unifying, and it also suggests a lot in the discussion about the concept of authors in Korea.
In the first part of this paper, we recount the events leading to the making of the Copyright Act. In the second part, we examine the various features of this Act in the light of contemporary law and economic knowledge to show how they had the combined effect of limiting the monopolistic effect of a copyright.
The pressure on harmony in the 20th century eventually forced us to accept systematic contradictions under the British Copyright Act. In other words, copyright as incompatible property rights, and Romanistic copyrights, have become institutionally mixed, and the British Copyright Act does not originally have an institutional framework to cover both rights.
There is also emphasis on the factors of labor, technology, or judgment, as mentioned in the preliminary paragraph, as well as the requirements for creativity In response, this requirement for data base works introduced under the EU Directive is an element of intellectual creativity. Discussions about the nature of authors also affect the theory of requirements for creativity. I think it is quite interesting to see whether the British Copyright Act will maintain duality regarding the requirements of creativity, or go in the direction of unifying, and it also suggests a lot in the discussion about the concept of authors in Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 역사적 배경
Ⅲ. 판례의 영향
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
정윤석 / 2003 / 로크 통치론 / 서울대학교 철학사상연구소
森村進 / 2001 / 自由はどこまで可能か：リバタリアニズム入門 / 講談社
Adam D. Moore / 2004 / Intellectual Property and Information Control: Philosophic Foundations and Contemporary Issues / Transaction Publishers
Deborah G. Johnson / 2001 / Computer Ethics / Prentice-Hall
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases
森村進 / 2001 / 自由はどこまで可能か：リバタリアニズム入門 / 講談社
Adam D. Moore / 2004 / Intellectual Property and Information Control: Philosophic Foundations and Contemporary Issues / Transaction Publishers
Deborah G. Johnson / 2001 / Computer Ethics / Prentice-Hall
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
앤 성문법(Statute of Anne), 그 후 ... - 영국에서 미술저작권의 역사 -
문화미디어엔터테인먼트법
2022 .06
-
Copyright Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
Copyright and the Value of Performance 1770-1911
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2020 .12
-
물권과 저작권의 공시제도에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2018 .02
-
1957년 저작권법 제정 과정과 특징
계간 저작권
2018 .01
-
Understanding copyright law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
Copyright, Its History and Its Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2020 .12
-
저작자의 지위
저스티스
2020 .12
-
(The)Copyright guide: How you can protect and profit from copyrights
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
-
혁신과 창작의 균형을 위한 저작권법 목적의 해석에 관한 연구 - 미국 저작권법의 목적과 원칙을 중심으로 -
법학연구
2023 .03
-
정보이용자의 개인정보보호에 관한 검토 - 저작권법상 이용자정보제공청구제도를 중심으로 -
IT와 법연구
2017 .01
-
사진의 법적 보호에 대한 초기 담론: 영국 미술저작권법(1862)을 중심으로
계간 저작권
2024 .09
-
Copyright, Creativity, Big Media and Cultural Value: Incorporating the Author
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2020 .12
-
남북한 저작권 교류실태와 e-저작권망 구축 제안
e-비즈니스연구
2023 .04
-
Art and Modern Copyright
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
-
일본 저작권등관리사업법의 검토 및 시사점
법과 정책연구
2021 .01
-
유럽연합에서의 저작권법 개혁에 관한 논의
계간 저작권
2015 .01
-
확장된 TPB모형에 근거한 대학생들의 저작권 행태분석 −2005년과 2018년 비교분석을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2019 .05
-
The Copyright/Design Interface
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
-
Comparative Digital Copyright Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2020 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-360-000558236