메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Tae Sik Kim (Hanyang University)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제44권 제1호
발행연도
2019.3
수록면
29 - 51 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper discusses numeral expressions in English. Generally, when power-of-ten words (e.g., hundred, thousand, etc.) are followed by nouns, we do not find a plural morpheme. For example, three hundred students is grammatical, but *three hundreds students is not. Based on this lack of plural agreement, Ahn (2017) recently proposes that numerals with power-of-ten words are compounds based on Donalies’ (2004) argument of compound categorization: since they are compounds, they are not subject to the plural agreement. However, Ahn’s (2017) proposal suffers from the phenomenon that numeral expressions are very productive and infinite. Also, the head with the target structure in Ahn (2017) seems to be counter-intuitive. Additionally, we can find empirical data that some compounds show the plural agreement. In this paper, I argue that numerals with power-of-ten words are not compound, but they are derived in Syntax. The alleged lack of plural agreement is due to the deletion of a plural morpheme -s to prevent an anti-locality violation based on a drastic PF effect in Grohmann (2003). This analysis has many advantages over Ahn (2017). It can easily explain the productivity of numeral expressions. Furthermore, we can maintain the essential plural agreement mechanism in English, which provides more theoretical uniformity.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Ahn (2017) and its problems
3. A Syntactic Account
4. Remaining Issues
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-701-000566233